Most active commenters
  • OutOfHere(5)
  • speedgoose(4)
  • pininja(3)
  • eptcyka(3)
  • DrillShopper(3)
  • viraptor(3)
  • remus(3)

←back to thread

210 points json_bourne_ | 91 comments | | HN request time: 1.615s | source | bottom
1. ndiddy ◴[] No.42158554[source]
Another similar incident happened around a week after that one: https://www.channel3000.com/news/dane-county-sheriffs-office... .

One thing to note is that the car doors in Teslas are electrically controlled and a different failsafe method of opening the doors is required when the electrical system isn't working. Here's the steps for manually opening the Model Y's rear doors (car in the story the post links to): https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_us/GUID-AAD769C... and here's the steps for manually opening the Model S's rear doors (car in the story I linked to): https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/models/en_us/GUID-AAD769C... . Note that this involves removing the rear carpet in the Model S and the door pocket mat in the Model Y, and that the Model Y instructions note that some cars aren't even equipped with manual rear door releases. It seems like Tesla didn't account at all for what happens if passengers who aren't familiar with the car need to quickly exit in an emergency, especially if the driver's incapacitated and can't give them directions.

replies(11): >>42158636 #>>42158643 #>>42158647 #>>42158773 #>>42158779 #>>42158811 #>>42158867 #>>42159003 #>>42159246 #>>42159730 #>>42162066 #
2. rightbyte ◴[] No.42158636[source]

     * Remove the mat from the bottom of the rear door pocket.
     * Press the red tab to remove the access door.
     * Pull the mechanical release cable forward.
It doesn't feel very panic friendly to have the emergency release hidden?
replies(4): >>42158677 #>>42158685 #>>42158853 #>>42160163 #
3. pininja ◴[] No.42158643[source]
Regulations are written in blood.. it’s really disappointing to see a car make it to production without an obvious mechanical way to open the door. I’ve been in many teslas and hadn’t given this much thought, figuring there’d surely be a way to open the door if I need to get out.
4. nemomarx ◴[] No.42158647[source]
why are the doors electronically controlled to start with? is it cost savings?
replies(6): >>42158674 #>>42158689 #>>42158699 #>>42158860 #>>42159267 #>>42160580 #
5. eptcyka ◴[] No.42158674[source]
It is more cyber that way. Also, yes, electromechanical systems are easier to design.
replies(1): >>42158780 #
6. beAbU ◴[] No.42158677[source]
Especially egregious considering it's likely kids will be back there. And the release is in a place thats probably impossible to get to from the front seat (in the model Y)
replies(2): >>42158741 #>>42159249 #
7. pininja ◴[] No.42158685[source]
Every Uber I take in a Tesla would practically need an airline safety briefing for this. There’s no way I’d find it on my own.
replies(3): >>42158835 #>>42160346 #>>42160574 #
8. cyberax ◴[] No.42158689[source]
They use frameless windows, so the electronic release slightly lowers them to avoid them scraping the door frame.
replies(5): >>42158761 #>>42158801 #>>42159286 #>>42159335 #>>42159386 #
9. dagmx ◴[] No.42158699[source]
A lot of cars have electronically controlled doors.

It’s due to the frameless windows. Opening the door requires the windows to roll down slightly to avoid damage to the outer trim.

The doors still have a mechanical release so there’s no cost savings involved. For the front door they’re right next to the electronic release. For the rear doors they’re hidden under the passenger door pocket.

Edit: to everyone replying I never said it was a necessity. I explained why they did it. I’m aware of alternate approaches.

replies(3): >>42158790 #>>42158904 #>>42158955 #
10. persedes ◴[] No.42158741{3}[source]
Munroe on YT complained about exactly that 4 years ago :/
11. PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42158761{3}[source]
Why do they want frameless windows?
replies(2): >>42158772 #>>42158778 #
12. dagmx ◴[] No.42158772{4}[source]
Frameless windows are aesthetically pleasing to many people. Tesla aren’t alone in that preference, they are just one of the few brands that use frameless by default even on the lowest end vehicles they sell, so there’s a higher number out there.
replies(1): >>42158957 #
13. noncoml ◴[] No.42158773[source]
Lexus’s latest cars have electrically controlled doors as well. The mechanical failover is a bit better mind you, you have to pull twice instead of pushing, but I am not sure how panic proof it is.

I live techlnology but IMHO it is overdone in modern cars. Please bring back tactile and mechanical controls where possible.

replies(1): >>42160760 #
14. throwuxiytayq ◴[] No.42158778{4}[source]
Why do they want glued-on RAM and SSDs?
15. globalise83 ◴[] No.42158779[source]
What is an "unlikely event" for any given passenger is nearly a 100% certainty for Tesla. The engineers and product managers who came up with that solution probably have trouble sleeping at night these days.
replies(2): >>42159185 #>>42159256 #
16. stouset ◴[] No.42158780{3}[source]
There’s still a second mechanical release so this is strictly more complicated than simply having a mechanical system to begin with.
replies(1): >>42158809 #
17. bahmboo ◴[] No.42158790{3}[source]
Not necessarily. Many cars have manual doors and frameless windows. A 1996 Subaru comes to mind. Tesla could easily make the windows dip when a mechanical handle was activated.

Electronic door latches are fine, it’s the backup mechanism that is the problem. Some cars have the mechanical alternate forward of the electrical release such that if you are grabbing frantically you would eventually pull it. This still looks minimal if that is more important than safety.

18. OptionOfT ◴[] No.42158801{3}[source]
In 2008 I had a BMW Convertible with frameless doors. When you pulled the door handle the window dropped. Same from the inside.
replies(1): >>42159109 #
19. eptcyka ◴[] No.42158809{4}[source]
Routing the mechanical linkage to a place in the door that would make sense for a door handle to be is the difficult and expensive part.
replies(1): >>42158875 #
20. giantg2 ◴[] No.42158811[source]
"Tesla didn't account at all for what happens ..."

Tesla might not have, but you can. Always have a glass breaker and seatbelt cutter in your vehicle. Doors get crumpled and can't open regardless of make/model.

replies(2): >>42158893 #>>42158976 #
21. OutOfHere ◴[] No.42158835{3}[source]
Cancel and rebook (another brand).
replies(2): >>42158907 #>>42159151 #
22. everybodyknows ◴[] No.42158853[source]
Why not do the first two steps, and stow the mat and access door on a shelf in your garage?
23. dvdbloc ◴[] No.42158860[source]
I always thought it was a luxury item like soft close doors on high end luxury cars. Supposed to feel premium compared to actually pulling a mechanical handle.
24. trinix912 ◴[] No.42158867[source]
> Note that this involves removing the rear carpet in the Model S and the door pocket mat in the Model Y

Seriously? How many people would be capable of pulling this stunt off in a burning vehicle filled with smoke? Especially considering the fact that in this case the vehicle was packed (5 people in it)--it's hard enough to get your own feet out of the way.

If this passes the safety regulations, those regulations should be changed. Not just expecting car manufacturers to do it out of their good will because they won't.

replies(1): >>42159062 #
25. davrosthedalek ◴[] No.42158875{5}[source]
Bowden cables are dirt cheap.
replies(1): >>42158925 #
26. jeffbee ◴[] No.42158893[source]
"Police say area man had burglary tools and weapons in his vehicle at the time of the arrest..."
27. tirant ◴[] No.42158904{3}[source]
Most current BMWs with frameless windows still have mechanical door openings (e.g. BMW i4).
replies(1): >>42158970 #
28. pininja ◴[] No.42158907{4}[source]
They've had huge pushes to add EVs to their network, which is great but this means it’s an increasingly likely for someone to get stuck. I’d include these instructions in their in-app safety center if I were them…
29. eptcyka ◴[] No.42158925{6}[source]
The cables are cheap, designing a door latch system to be easy to install/cheap to manufacture is not. Why do you think all parking brakes on all ICE vehicles have turned electric now?
replies(1): >>42159184 #
30. xbar ◴[] No.42158955{3}[source]
This is a design choice, not a requirement.

My frameless-windows 2007 car uses a mechanical door latch and the window rolls down slightly as I pull the latch.

replies(1): >>42159164 #
31. onetokeoverthe ◴[] No.42158957{5}[source]
at the funeral...

"at least they had pleasing windows."

32. badgersnake ◴[] No.42158970{4}[source]
Indeed, my 2001 E46 BMW had this. It’s not complicated or new.
replies(1): >>42162685 #
33. fallingsquirrel ◴[] No.42158976[source]
> Always have a glass breaker

Isn't this advice becoming dated now that most new cars have side windows with laminated glass?

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a28422725/car-windows-glas...

replies(4): >>42159033 #>>42159186 #>>42160357 #>>42160671 #
34. trog ◴[] No.42159003[source]
Someone on Mastodon pointed out that not all Model Ys even have the manual release. I didn't believe this could be true - how could regulators allow this?

But it's actually listed on the Model Y page (https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_us/GUID-AAD769C...): "Note Not all Model Y vehicles are equipped with a manual release for the rear doors."

Not sure what the distribution is or whether it's just an "old version" problem?

replies(1): >>42159459 #
35. dyauspitr ◴[] No.42159033{3}[source]
Still probably easier to kick out a laminated window with cracks in it.
36. unsnap_biceps ◴[] No.42159062[source]
Regulations are written in blood. This is likely the first time a mass produced car went this far in not caring about the humans inside. I would say that they will be new regulations soon, but given the political climate in the US, I'm unsure if it will actually happen.

We can only hope that Canada and other countries takes the lead and forces the improvements to passenger safety.

37. neuralRiot ◴[] No.42159109{4}[source]
Every car with frameless windows does this without the need for a death-trap electric door release, i work in McLarens and the windows will drop if the battery gets low so you can open the vertical doors with a dead battery.
38. speedgoose ◴[] No.42159151{4}[source]
Wouldn’t the average car safety be significantly below a Tesla Model Y anyway?
replies(1): >>42159167 #
39. hughesjj ◴[] No.42159164{4}[source]
Also every convertible ever
40. OutOfHere ◴[] No.42159167{5}[source]
Tesla has the highest fatality rate, so that is ruled out! :)

Secondly, it is the coupling of electronic controls with unintuitive manual backups that create the danger.

replies(4): >>42159341 #>>42159348 #>>42159624 #>>42160256 #
41. newaccount74 ◴[] No.42159184{7}[source]
Probably because forgetting to pull the handbrake is a very common cause of accidents?
42. solardev ◴[] No.42159185[source]
I bet they wanted something more obvious but were overridden by someone who wanted to keep the vehicle sleek and futuristic. If so, it's the worst kind of "I told you so" :/
replies(1): >>42159441 #
43. OutOfHere ◴[] No.42159186{3}[source]
Kick out the window with a very forceful boot kick with both legs.
replies(1): >>42159356 #
44. DrillShopper ◴[] No.42159246[source]
Damn if only we had the tech to open doors mechanically. Imagine that world. I hope Elon takes a few weeks away from destroying the US Government in January to think about this./s

For real though, I hope the relatives of the deceased take Elon personally and Tesla as a company for all they're worth.

replies(1): >>42160330 #
45. Symbiote ◴[] No.42159249{3}[source]
I have written this before [1].

I had to kick the rear door of the family car after an accident when I was about 11. The car blocking both doors on the other side was on fire, and I was later told our car was also on fire.

I wouldn't have known to lift the carpet and pull some release tag, and with the door badly damaged from a collision I also wouldn't have been able to kick it while pulling the tab. It was night, so finding and using a glass-smashing tool also seems unlikely.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25941750

replies(1): >>42160337 #
46. DrillShopper ◴[] No.42159256[source]
Someone told me something that stuck with me: "for any system with millions of users a 1 in a million event happens multiple times a day"
replies(1): >>42161471 #
47. DrillShopper ◴[] No.42159267[source]
To make the marks they're selling the death sedans to feel like they have something special until the vape batteries under the car spontaneously combust and roast them like a gas station hotdog
48. ◴[] No.42159286{3}[source]
49. lttlrck ◴[] No.42159335{3}[source]
Dropping the windows on frameless doors goes back to at least the 90s and mechanical door handles.

I wouldn't be surprised if it goes back even earlier and someone even tried it entirely mechanically without electric windows...

Update: it looks like it was first done on 1946 Buick convertibles.

50. viraptor ◴[] No.42159341{6}[source]
That statistic is not controlling for the drivers. It's interesting, but it may be biased by who buys Tesla and how they drive. Similar to likely "cars with aggressive custom paint jobs have higher fatality rate".
replies(1): >>42159368 #
51. remus ◴[] No.42159348{6}[source]
> Tesla has the highest fatality rate, so that is ruled out! :)

Do you have a source? Genuinely interested. From the little reading I've done Tesla seem to have put quite a bit of thought in to making their cars perform well in crash tests so it seems surprising that they'd have a high fatality rate.

replies(2): >>42159485 #>>42159752 #
52. viraptor ◴[] No.42159356{4}[source]
That advice will work for significantly limited number of population. Like, it's true, but also "hope you have enough mass/strength/flexibility". My little-old-lady neighbour could not do it.
53. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42159368{7}[source]
Doesn’t matter if you’re getting in someone else’s car.
replies(1): >>42159389 #
54. yibg ◴[] No.42159386{3}[source]
There were plenty of older frameless doors where the door itself opens mechanically and the window lowers slightly. A lot of the older subarus for example.

What's special about Tesla (or any of the other newer cars with full electrical door opening mechanisms) that makes this not an option?

replies(2): >>42159458 #>>42163497 #
55. viraptor ◴[] No.42159389{8}[source]
Maybe. Taxi drivers have different incentives/experience/routes than the other population. It may apply to them, or not. For ride share, the choice of Tesla may have been mainly economical for them.
56. renewedrebecca ◴[] No.42159441{3}[source]
But who at Tesla would do that?
replies(1): >>42160431 #
57. cyberax ◴[] No.42159458{4}[source]
> What's special about Tesla (or any of the other newer cars with full electrical door opening mechanisms) that makes this not an option?

Cost-cutting, mostly.

58. MichaelZuo ◴[] No.42159459[source]
Some countries may not require it, though it does seem pretty suspicious to omit that, regardless of what regulatory quirks there are in the world.
59. atoav ◴[] No.42159485{7}[source]
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevebanker/2023/12/18/tesla-ha...
replies(1): >>42159602 #
60. speedgoose ◴[] No.42159602{8}[source]
Isn’t it missing the death aspect ?
replies(1): >>42163046 #
61. speedgoose ◴[] No.42159624{6}[source]
I would still favour the car that has good crash test safety scores and AI powered safety features that work relatively well according to independent tests, over the random taxi.

But otherwise I agree, the door opening mechanism should be improved.

62. semiquaver ◴[] No.42159730[source]

  > Note: Not all Model Y vehicles are equipped with a manual release for the rear doors.
Astounding.
63. OutOfHere ◴[] No.42159752{7}[source]
"Tesla Has Highest Fatal Accident Rate of All Auto Brands: Study" (2024)

https://autos.yahoo.com/tesla-highest-fatal-accident-rate-16...

replies(1): >>42160105 #
64. remus ◴[] No.42160105{8}[source]
Interesting quote from that piece:

> The study's authors make clear that the results do not indicate Tesla vehicles are inherently unsafe or have design flaws. In fact, Tesla vehicles are loaded with safety technology; the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) named the 2024 Model Y as a Top Safety Pick+ award winner, for example. Many of the other cars that ranked highly on the list have also been given high ratings for safety by the likes of IIHS and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, as well.

> So, why are Teslas — and many other ostensibly safe cars on the list — involved in so many fatal crashes? “The models on this list likely reflect a combination of driver behavior and driving conditions, leading to increased crashes and fatalities,” iSeeCars executive analyst Karl Brauer said in the report. “A focused, alert driver, traveling at a legal or prudent speed, without being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, is the most likely to arrive safely regardless of the vehicle they’re driving.”

replies(3): >>42160761 #>>42162662 #>>42194480 #
65. more_corn ◴[] No.42160163[source]
Yeah that’s not happening when you’re literally on fire.
66. valval ◴[] No.42160256{6}[source]
The analysis you refer to isn’t super interesting as it’s not controlled.

You’d need to be able to prove that independent safety and crash testing organisations are pushing out faulty results, since Teslas are among the safest (if not the safest) cars by their standards.

67. valval ◴[] No.42160330[source]
> Some crazy shit with /s

> Double down on the crazy shit this time for real

68. redwall_hp ◴[] No.42160337{4}[source]
You probably can't break the glass either. Newer vehicles, especially Teslas, often have laminated glass that glass breakers have been found to not break.
replies(1): >>42160584 #
69. ipython ◴[] No.42160346{3}[source]
That would be a fantastic idea: sell printed Tesla safety cards in the style of airplane safety cards.
replies(1): >>42161090 #
70. giantg2 ◴[] No.42160357{3}[source]
Usually rear windows do not. Even laminated side windows can be defeated more easily if cracked. The lamination is pretty thin compared to many other types of laminated glass.
71. solardev ◴[] No.42160431{4}[source]
It's quite a mystery, isn't it?
72. throw0101b ◴[] No.42160574{3}[source]
> Every Uber I take in a Tesla would practically need an airline safety briefing for this.

If your Uber ride is a Model Y you may be SOL:

    Not all Model Y vehicles are equipped with a manual release for the rear doors.
replies(1): >>42160970 #
73. rad_gruchalski ◴[] No.42160580[source]
How are you otherwise going to close the door with a button on that ipad in the middle?
74. thatguymike ◴[] No.42160584{5}[source]
I hear a ball bearing will do the job nicely.
75. tetha ◴[] No.42160671{3}[source]
This is something I found worrying, tbh.

With tempered glass, firefighters heading for a vehicle accident attach glass breakers on a string to their gloves. That way, they can pull a person out of a car in 20 seconds if the immediate danger is larger than the medical considerations, and the person isn't stuck.

With laminated windows, you need a Halligan bar or some other poking tool (sometimes forcefully moving a spike towards a patient) to make a hole, a Sawzall which needs 10 seconds alone to go through common glass, time to get all of that...

It's worrying how much faster vehicle safety is moving compared to emergency extraction capabilities.

76. l1tany11 ◴[] No.42160760[source]
I’d be curious if there’s a single brand that has no electronic door latches at this point. Every brand I can think of has them on at least one vehicle. They have been in mainstream brands (like Chevy) for like 20+ years now.
77. OutOfHere ◴[] No.42160761{9}[source]
I am going to look at the data, not at the subjective reinterpretation or subjective rating.
replies(1): >>42162559 #
78. FireBeyond ◴[] No.42160970{4}[source]
How did this even get past the NHTSA/DOT - that has to be illegal. Electrical doors, with no failsafe?
replies(1): >>42169078 #
79. magnetowasright ◴[] No.42161090{4}[source]
I think it'd be fantastic to not need it in the first place. It is just utterly beyond reason that this is even a thing.
replies(2): >>42161265 #>>42161335 #
80. justinclift ◴[] No.42161265{5}[source]
Yeah. Wonder if this "safety feature" was designed by a Boeing contractor?

It'd be on-par for them, or at least the MCAS designers.

81. ipython ◴[] No.42161335{5}[source]
Sorry, I meant “fantastic” in the same sense as the fight club airplane safety cards: for example https://www.etsy.com/listing/1017594442/project-mayhem-fligh...
82. theolivenbaum ◴[] No.42161471{3}[source]
I think the original quote was "One in a million is next Tuesday": https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/larryosterma...
83. Schiendelman ◴[] No.42162066[source]
I'm always surprised to see this comment without seeing a response that this is required by law in the United States. Remember child locks? They are on all cars. The manual release cannot override the child lock so it has to be hidden to meet federal law.
84. remus ◴[] No.42162559{10}[source]
A good instinct, but the point is it's important to think about what the data means. The authors of the paper are just saying that the populations of people driving each type of car are different so looking at a percentage of fatalities is not particularly informative. If you took all those people who currently drive 20 year old fords at 10 under the speed limit and put them in teslas, maybe the tesla fatality rate per billion miles would start to look a bit better.
85. figassis ◴[] No.42162662{9}[source]
Sure, makes sense, but then we have the invisible, possibly non existent emergency door release. Do they also go through the effort of pointing this out as a factor in the statistics? Or is that not counted as a design flaw? Whether they’re saying the truth or not, i think in these roles, it’s very easy to omit damaging information while not outright lying. It’s also easy to be taken to lunch by a Tesla person to talk about how to cushion the reports impact.
86. soramimo ◴[] No.42162685{5}[source]
I still have over one these and can confirm the doors open with the battery disconnected.
87. atoav ◴[] No.42163046{9}[source]
It is found straight at the source: https://www.iseecars.com/most-dangerous-cars-study#v=2024
replies(1): >>42167740 #
88. Citizen_Lame ◴[] No.42163497{4}[source]
It's impossible cannot be done. They tried nothing and were out of ideas.
89. speedgoose ◴[] No.42167740{10}[source]
Thanks. It's US data only but that's a fine source.
90. limit499karma ◴[] No.42169078{5}[source]
I'm an oligarch an I'm o.k.

I break laws every single day ...

91. fennecfoxy ◴[] No.42194480{9}[source]
So it's because irresponsible tech bros & the like are driving high performance electric cars at speeds and accelerations that they're not used to after the Toyota that they owned previously?

I feel like this gonna become a real problem as (any brand of) electric cars fill out the world's fleet.