Most active commenters
  • UltraSane(14)
  • valval(5)
  • porphyra(3)
  • gitaarik(3)

←back to thread

410 points jjulius | 36 comments | | HN request time: 0.675s | source | bottom
1. UltraSane ◴[] No.41885410[source]
I'm astonished at how long Musk has been able to keep his autonomous driving con going. He has been lying about it to inflate Tesla shares for 10 years now.
replies(4): >>41885430 #>>41885475 #>>41885487 #>>41894628 #
2. ryandrake ◴[] No.41885430[source]
Without consequences, there is no reason to stop.
replies(1): >>41885438 #
3. UltraSane ◴[] No.41885438[source]
When is the market going to realize Tesla is NEVER going to have real level 4 autonomy where Tesla takes legal liability for crashes the way Waymo has?
replies(2): >>41885561 #>>41886986 #
4. UltraSane ◴[] No.41885483[source]
It "works" if you mean often does incredibly stupid and dangerous things and requires a person to be ready to take over for it at any moment to prevent a crash. So far no Tesla car has ever legally driven even a single mile without a person in the driver's seat.
replies(1): >>41890122 #
5. porphyra ◴[] No.41885487[source]
Just because it has taken 10 years longer than promised doesn't mean that it will never happen. FSD has made huge improvements this year and is on track to keep up the current pace so it actually does seem closer than ever.
replies(2): >>41885527 #>>41888830 #
6. UltraSane ◴[] No.41885527[source]
The current vision-only system is a clear technological dead-end that can't go much more than 10 miles between "disengagements". To be clear, "disengagements" would be crashes if a human wasn't ready to take over. And not needing a human driver is THE ENTIRE POINT! I will admit Musk isn't a liar when Tesla has FSD at least as good as Waymo's system and Tesla accepts legal liability for any crashes.
replies(1): >>41886198 #
7. tstrimple ◴[] No.41885561{3}[source]
Market cares far more about money than lives. Until the lives lost cost more than their profit, they give less than zero fucks. Capitalism. Yay!
8. two_handfuls ◴[] No.41885608[source]
I tried it. It drives worse than a teenager.

There is absolutely no way this can safely drive a car without supervision.

replies(1): >>41886215 #
9. peutetre ◴[] No.41885611[source]
Musk believes Tesla without FSD is "worth basically zero": https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-tesla-worth-basica...

Musk is now moving the FSD work to xAI, taking what supposedly makes the public company Tesla valuable and placing it into his private ownership: https://www.wsj.com/tech/tesla-xai-partnership-elon-musk-30e...

Seems like a good way to privatize shareholder capital.

10. valval ◴[] No.41886198{3}[source]
You’re wrong. Nothing about this is clear, and you’d be silly to claim otherwise.

You should explore your bias and where it’s coming from.

replies(1): >>41887902 #
11. valval ◴[] No.41886215{3}[source]
It’s been safer than a human driver for years. It’s also not meant to be unsupervised.
replies(3): >>41888839 #>>41889379 #>>41891531 #
12. UltraSane ◴[] No.41887902{4}[source]
No Tesla vehicle has legally driven even a single mile with no driver in the driver's seat. They aren't even trying to play Waymo's game. The latest FSD software's failure rate is at least 100 times higher than it needs to be.
replies(1): >>41888135 #
13. fallingknife ◴[] No.41888135{5}[source]
That's a stupid point. I've been in a Tesla that's driven a mile by itself. It makes no difference if a person is in the seat.
replies(1): >>41888440 #
14. UltraSane ◴[] No.41888440{6}[source]
"It makes no difference if a person is in the seat." It does when Musk is claiming that Tesla is going to sell a car with no steering wheel!

The current Tesla FSD fails so often that a human HAS to be in the driver seat ready to take over at any moment.

You really don't understand the enormous difference between the current crappy level 2 Tesla FSD and Waymo's level 4 system?

replies(2): >>41889921 #>>41897998 #
15. gitaarik ◴[] No.41888830[source]
Just like AGI and the year of the Linux desktop ;P
replies(1): >>41890545 #
16. gitaarik ◴[] No.41888839{4}[source]
Something about these two statements seem to be in conflict with each other, but maybe that is just kinda Tesla PR talk.
replies(2): >>41889902 #>>41891387 #
17. lawn ◴[] No.41889379{4}[source]
Safer than a human driver...

According to Tesla.

18. valval ◴[] No.41889902{5}[source]
It’s quite easy to be safer than a human driver, since humans are just human. Supervision is required because the system can face edge cases.
replies(2): >>41889941 #>>41891391 #
19. valval ◴[] No.41889921{7}[source]
The difference is that Tesla has a general algorithm, while Waymo is hard coding scenarios.

I never really got why people bring Waymo up every time Tesla’s FSD is mentioned. Waymo isn’t competing with Tesla’s vision.

replies(2): >>41890584 #>>41891302 #
20. gitaarik ◴[] No.41889941{6}[source]
Ah ok so if humans would be supervised for their edge cases then humans would actually be safer!
21. jjmarr ◴[] No.41890122{3}[source]
And? How does that make Elon Musk a con artist?

It's possible to physically get in a Tesla and have it drive you from point A to point B. That's a self-driving car. You're saying it's unreliable, makes mistakes, and can be used illegally. That doesn't mean the car can't drive itself, just that it doesn't do a very good job at "self-driving"

replies(1): >>41891382 #
22. porphyra ◴[] No.41890545{3}[source]
Honestly LLMs were a big step towards AGI, and gaming on Linux is practically flawless now. Just played through Black Myth Wukong with no issues out of the box.
replies(1): >>41891323 #
23. porphyra ◴[] No.41890584{8}[source]
Waymo uses a learned planner and is far from "hardcoded". In any case, imo both of these can be true:

* Tesla FSD works surprisingly well and improving capabilities to hands free actual autonomy isn't as far fetched as one might think.

* Waymo beat them to robotaxi deployment and scaling up to multiple cities may not be as hard as people say.

It seems that self driving car fans are way too tribal and seem to be convinced that the "other side" sucks and is guaranteed to fail. In reality, it is very unclear as both strategies have their merits and only time will tell in the long run.

replies(1): >>41891319 #
24. UltraSane ◴[] No.41891302{8}[source]
The difference is that Waymo has a very well engineered system using vision, LIDAR, and millimeter wave RADAR that works well enough in limited areas to provide tens of thousands of actual driver-less rides. Tesla has a vision only system that sucks so bad a human has to be ready to take over for it at any time like a parent monitoring a toddler near stairs.
replies(1): >>41901655 #
25. UltraSane ◴[] No.41891319{9}[source]
" Tesla FSD works surprisingly well and improving capabilities to hands free actual autonomy isn't as far fetched as one might think"

Except FSD doesn't work surprisingly well and there is no way it will get as good as Waymo using vision-only.

"It seems that self driving car fans are way too tribal and seem to be convinced that the "other side" sucks and is guaranteed to fail."

I'm not being tribal, I'm being realistic based on the very public performance of both systems.

If Musk was serious about his Robotaxi claims then Tesla would be operating very differently. Instead it is pretty obvious it all a con to inflate Tesla shares beyond all reason.

26. UltraSane ◴[] No.41891323{4}[source]
LLMs are to AGI

as

A ladder is to getting to orbit.

I can seem LLMs serving as a kind of memory for an AGI but something fundamentally different will be needed for true reasoning and continues self-improvement.

27. UltraSane ◴[] No.41891382{4}[source]
"How does that make Elon Musk a con artist?"

Because since 2014 he has made wildly unrealistic claims that he is smart enough to know were BS.

December 2015: “We’re going to end up with complete autonomy, and I think we will have complete autonomy in approximately two years.”

January 2016 In ~2 years, summon should work anywhere connected by land & not blocked by borders, eg you're in LA and the car is in NY

June 2016: “I really consider autonomous driving a solved problem, I think we are less than two years away from complete autonomy, safer than humans.”

October 2016 By the end of next year, said Musk, Tesla would demonstrate a fully autonomous drive from, say, a home in L.A., to Times Square ... without the need for a single touch, including the charging.

"A 2016 video that Tesla used to promote its self-driving technology was staged to show capabilities like stopping at a red light and accelerating at a green light that the system did not have, according to testimony by a senior engineer."

January 2017 The sensor hardware and compute power required for at least level 4 to level 5 autonomy has been in every Tesla produced since October of last year.

March 2017: “I think that [you will be able to fall asleep in a Tesla] in about two years.”

May 2017 Update on the coast to coast autopilot demo? - Still on for end of year. Just software limited. Any Tesla car with HW2 (all cars built since Oct last year) will be able to do this.

March 2018 I think probably by end of next year [end of 2019] self-driving will encompass essentially all modes of driving and be at least 100% to 200% safer than a person.

February 2019 We will be feature complete full self driving this year. The car will be able to find you in a parking lot, pick you up, take you all the way to your destination without an intervention this year. I'm certain of that. That is not a question mark. It will be essentially safe to fall asleep and wake up at their destination towards the end of next year

April 2019 We expect to be feature complete in self driving this year, and we expect to be confident enough from our standpoint to say that we think people do not need to touch the wheel and can look out the window sometime probably around the second quarter of next year.

May 2019 We could have gamed an LA/NY Autopilot journey last year, but when we do it this year, everyone with Tesla Full Self-Driving will be able to do it too

December 2020 I'm extremely confident that Tesla will have level five next year, extremely confident, 100%

January 2021 FSD will be capable of Level 5 autonomy by the end of 2021

replies(1): >>41892800 #
28. UltraSane ◴[] No.41891387{5}[source]
It is cultish doublespeak.
29. UltraSane ◴[] No.41891391{6}[source]
Edge cases like intersections?
30. two_handfuls ◴[] No.41891531{4}[source]
"safer than a human driver for years" can be misleading, since the system is supervised - it assists the human driver. So what we're comparing is human+FSD vs avg car (with whatever driver assist it has).

The claim that FSD+human is safer than an average car is old and has since been debunked: if instead of comparing vs all cars (old and new, with and without driver assistance) you compare like for like: other cars of similar price also with cruise control and lanekeeping assistance, then the Tesla cars are as safe as the others.

And to be clear, none of those are autonomous. There is a certification process for autonomous cars, followed by Waymo Mercedes and others. Tesla has not even started this process.

31. jjmarr ◴[] No.41892800{5}[source]
Do you have any citations? I would like to read them.
replies(1): >>41893033 #
32. UltraSane ◴[] No.41893033{6}[source]
https://motherfrunker.ca/fsd/
33. heisenbit ◴[] No.41894628[source]
"I'm a technologist, I know a lot about computers," Musk told the crowd during the event. "And I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program, because it's just too easy to hack."
34. fallingknife ◴[] No.41897998{7}[source]
Who said anything about Waymo? Waymo is building a very high cost commercial grade system intended for use on revenue generating vehicles. Tesla is building a low cost system intended for personal vehicles where Waymo's system would be cost prohibitive. Obviously Waymo's system is massively more capable. But that is about as surprising as the fact that a Ferrari is faster than a Ford Ranger.

But this is all irrelevant to my point. You said a Tesla is not capable of driving itself for a mile. I have personally seen one do it. Whether a person is sitting in the driver's seat, or the regulators will allow it, has nothing to do with the fact that the vehicle does, in fact, have that capability.

replies(1): >>41899819 #
35. valval ◴[] No.41901655{9}[source]
Wait until you hear Waymo has people ready to step in with remote controls at all times.
replies(1): >>41906016 #
36. UltraSane ◴[] No.41906016{10}[source]
NO. Waymo cars are never remote-controlled. Remote controlling cars in traffic is too dangerous do to latency severely limited. What Waymo does is have operators provide hints. At no time is the autonomous system ever disabled. Just another example of how much better engineered Waymo is than Tesla's FSD scam.