←back to thread

US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash

(www.reuters.com)
410 points jjulius | 1 comments | 18 Oct 24 16:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
UltraSane ◴[19 Oct 24 03:23 UTC] No.41885410[source]▶
I'm astonished at how long Musk has been able to keep his autonomous driving con going. He has been lying about it to inflate Tesla shares for 10 years now.
replies(4): >>41885430 #>>41885475 #>>41885487 #>>41894628 #
jjmarr[dead post] ◴[19 Oct 24 03:38 UTC] No.41885475[source]▶
[flagged]
two_handfuls ◴[19 Oct 24 04:19 UTC] No.41885608[source]▶
I tried it. It drives worse than a teenager.

There is absolutely no way this can safely drive a car without supervision.

replies(1): >>41886215 #
valval ◴[19 Oct 24 07:15 UTC] No.41886215[source]▶
It’s been safer than a human driver for years. It’s also not meant to be unsupervised.
replies(3): >>41888839 #>>41889379 #>>41891531 #
gitaarik ◴[19 Oct 24 16:40 UTC] No.41888839[source]▶
Something about these two statements seem to be in conflict with each other, but maybe that is just kinda Tesla PR talk.
replies(2): >>41889902 #>>41891387 #
valval ◴[19 Oct 24 19:09 UTC] No.41889902[source]▶
It’s quite easy to be safer than a human driver, since humans are just human. Supervision is required because the system can face edge cases.
replies(2): >>41889941 #>>41891391 #
1. UltraSane ◴[19 Oct 24 22:49 UTC] No.41891391[source]▶
Edge cases like intersections?