I'm not for heavily regulating non-safety details of how most industries do business, but I do think it's fair to demand the true price up front and compensation when the airline doesn't provide the service it sold for reasons within its control.
I'm not for heavily regulating non-safety details of how most industries do business, but I do think it's fair to demand the true price up front and compensation when the airline doesn't provide the service it sold for reasons within its control.
I was positively surprised at their proactive communication. The money was on my account within the week!
[1] https://www.firstonline.info/en/trenitalia-rimborsi-automati...
Too many times I’ve seen flights, closer to empty than full, mysteriously cancelled due to “mechanical issues”.
Yes things happen on their own. But others are motivated by profit.
Passengers only options were to either deal with the dehydration or declare an actual emergency and get official medical transport off of the plane to an ER and deal with whatever bills/consequences that might generate.
Why the exception for this then? There are many situations where regulations could protect consumers and I don't understand why you have the general view against non-safety regulations.
That doesn't excuse the flight crew for not handing out water however. That's just a cheap airline being stingier than necessary.
The most important is that airlines have the ability and motivation to force passengers to accept unfavorable terms, and passengers have no ability to negotiate more favorable terms. Many routes are only served by one airline, so there isn't even competitive pressure in those cases. There's also a financial incentive for airlines to mistreat customers, e.g. by overbooking flights, canceling underbooked flights, and delaying non-mandatory maintenance until the cheapest or most convenient time.
I believe in regulation for the market to protect consumers for all products and services.
- after 1hr delay, they must provide access to water/A/C/heat/lavatories. Also to medical assistance (if needed). - and after 5hrs on tarmac, passengers must be given the chance to leave the aircraft. - Exceptions: These rules do not apply if the delay is due to safety, security, or ATC reasons.
Making you wait outside on the tarmac before boarding is bad but skirts the regulations. They key clock time to watch is how long were you waiting after boarding the plane?
Probably also useful to reference your specific EU rights if they object.
If after 1+1hrs wait, passengers were going to faint unless they got water, that seems to be pushing "would need medical assistance".