←back to thread

112 points thunderbong | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.659s | source
Show context
lokar ◴[] No.42200889[source]
I see apple as like LVMH, but for phones. It has a minority of overall sales, but a majority of the “luxury” part of the market. This gives them influence over the whole market, but not a real monopoly.
replies(7): >>42200914 #>>42201067 #>>42201094 #>>42201131 #>>42201148 #>>42201290 #>>42210472 #
dismalaf ◴[] No.42201067[source]
It's strange how they've convinced people that, considering there's nothing at all luxurious about their products, not even the price...
replies(1): >>42201442 #
bobbylarrybobby ◴[] No.42201442[source]
What's luxurious about Apple products is that they tend to respect your time
replies(6): >>42201472 #>>42201662 #>>42202285 #>>42202412 #>>42202452 #>>42203585 #
dismalaf ◴[] No.42201472[source]
Those are words without much meaning. So, how do you think they "respect" your time more than other smartphones?
replies(1): >>42201663 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42201663[source]
> how do you think they "respect" your time more than other smartphones?

I have an iPhone. It just does its job. Updates in the background. Repairs are a peach, especially by mail. They don’t spam me.

replies(1): >>42201717 #
dismalaf ◴[] No.42201717[source]
Updates in the background? It's not 2005 anymore... All phones do that. Androids have done that since version 1.0. Just works? Ditto. So the answer is just... vibes?
replies(1): >>42201849 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42201849[source]
Partially yes, Android vs iPhone is largely vibes. The point is it’s a product that works for years without the user having to fuck with it too much for most use cases. If the hardware fits your needs, it’s the best in the world. If you like a 3.5mm jack, there are other options—hence why it’s tough to argue they have a smartphone monopoly.

If you’re asking why it’s luxury, it’s a combination of the materials, machining and service experience. Luxury products aren’t necessarily better, certainly not for someone who can’t afford them. They’re simply more luxurious. Easier, more comfortable, et cetera.

replies(1): >>42201905 #
dismalaf ◴[] No.42201905[source]
This is the thing though. Non-Apple phones are made of equally nice materials, have equally nice design and equal or more utility. Several Samsung phones and the folding Pixel are more money than the top end iPhone. Hell, because of carrier subsidies the top end iPhone can be had for $0 up front.

So what makes an iPhone more luxurious than say, a Galaxy S24 Ultra, Z Fold 6, Pixel 9 Pro XL or 9 Pro Fold?

replies(1): >>42201913 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42201913[source]
> Non-Apple phones are made of equally nice materials

The machine quality is totally different.

> what makes an iPhone more luxurious than say, a Galaxy S24 Ultra, Z Fold 6, Pixel 9 Pro XL or 9 Pro Fold

Start with the BOM.

replies(1): >>42202094 #
dismalaf ◴[] No.42202094[source]
Lol so it's the logo and marketing. Gotcha.
replies(1): >>42202538 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42202538[source]
I mean yes, that’s a big part of what distinguishes luxury goods. Again, luxury doesn’t mean better.

When I say machine quality, though, I’m referring to their titanium and aluminum. I’ve machined some aluminum and know people who have done titanium. It’s really hard, and they do it well.

What does that add to the user experience? I can’t say it’s anything tangible. But I appreciate it. That’s luxury. It’s orthogonal to utility in many ways.

replies(2): >>42204341 #>>42205441 #
2. whatisthiseven ◴[] No.42204341[source]
I think when you say "luxury goods" you mean to say Veblen Goods, which are about signaling wealth or status through the purchase of a particular brand. When the functions of a good are divorced from its price and the brand is what defines "the luxury", it ceases to signal quality and instead is a signal all its own.
replies(1): >>42210964 #
3. dismalaf ◴[] No.42205441[source]
I know you're referring to the materials. And I'm saying you can find those same materials in Android phones.

I'm used to actual luxury goods, watches and clothing for example, where the quality is very much noticeably better. A Rolex or Audemars has way more attention to detail than, say, a Tissot or Tag which has far nicer materials than a Timex. Or suits, the kinds of fabric on higher end suits are very noticeable.

Or luxury restaurants. Where the ingredients, techniques, staffing levels and attention to detail far surpass normal restaurants.

Whereas with iPhone versus Samsung S24 Ultra, both are titanium, Samsung has nicer glass, less bevel and more utility (also costs more). The only real difference is Apple has much better marketing and their stores are nicer. Better logo too. Beyond that, there's no quantifiable quality advantage.

replies(1): >>42210982 #
4. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42210964[source]
> when you say "luxury goods" you mean to say Veblen Goods, which are about signaling wealth or status through the purchase of a particular brand

No, I mean luxury good. I upgraded my phone for satellite-based emergency SOS and the titanium form factor. Those are luxuries. Same for my 2020 Mac and M1.

Apple’s products aren’t priced high enough to function as Veblen goods in most developed-country social circles. They’re a mass market product.

5. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42210982[source]
> I'm used to actual luxury goods

Yes. Me too. We’re rich and accustomed to luxury on HN. News at 11.

I don’t like the S24. Part of that is familiarity with iOS, which makes Android’s interface and design language feel clunky. Part of that is the squared-off look. I don’t deny that it’s a luxury product, too.

> Rolex or Audemars

Good example. I know plenty of watch connoisseurs who don’t believe Rolex makes a luxury product. They use similar arguments to yours, down to details of the movement and price. I think they’re wrong on designation even if I, too, don’t like Rolex either. (Patek and Vacheron Constantin.)