Most active commenters
  • Syntonicles(3)

←back to thread

184 points mikhael | 12 comments | | HN request time: 0.77s | source | bottom
Show context
v7n ◴[] No.45660268[source]
I was immediately reminded of the anti-twist mechanism, perhaps unrelated but "reset rotation, twice/half" comes up there as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-twister_mechanism

replies(4): >>45660536 #>>45661316 #>>45661783 #>>45666297 #
1. Syntonicles ◴[] No.45661316[source]
What?!

Thank you! I'm working on a robot with a very expensive slip ring, and need to send high fidelity data through it with shielding. I had no idea this was possible this will make things so much easier!

I found a related video you might find interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZvimEf6DFw

I'm currently studying group theory and SO3 rotations (quaternions & matrix groups) and I'm also curious about the connection. I still have a lot to learn but I wouldn't be surprised if the reset rotation is unique, if we abstract away variation.

replies(4): >>45661883 #>>45661989 #>>45662238 #>>45664429 #
2. actionfromafar ◴[] No.45661883[source]
I see it, yet I can barely believe it.
3. v7n ◴[] No.45661989[source]
Always happy to share! I came across this while planning a 3D scanning (photogrammetry) rig. Perhaps you'll be the one to figure out gravity can be modelled as a rotation around an axis in a fourth dimension, wrapping clingy spacetime around itself? ;) I'm not clever enough for that.
4. meindnoch ◴[] No.45662238[source]
There's a bit of a caveat with the anti-twister mechanism, namely, that the wiring must be loose enough to pass around the supplied rotating part.
replies(3): >>45662570 #>>45662667 #>>45666115 #
5. SyzygyRhythm ◴[] No.45662570[source]
This is important. The mechanism doesn't really work the way you want most of the time. I occasionally see a claim that you can power a carousel with this method, but it doesn't work. You would have to have the cable go out and around the carousel structure, and then into the top. And the cable would still move relative to the ground and the carousel.

You could, in principle, have a totally internal system, but with arms that grab and release the cable at intervals so that the looped portion can pass by them. You could arrange the timing so that electrical contact is never lost. But you are still making/breaking contact and it starts to lose some apparent advantages compared to a slip ring.

That's not to say it isn't still useful for some purposes, like maybe a radio antenna that isn't too impacted by a cable moving in front on occasion. But it doesn't eliminate all uses for a slip ring.

replies(1): >>45666304 #
6. jojobas ◴[] No.45662667[source]
And no axle to rotate on.
7. AugusteDupin ◴[] No.45664429[source]
As meindnoch points out, the connection needs to loop over the rotating object. That is no problem if the only affect of the rotation that interests you is the centrifugal force.

When you give plasma (not whole blood) the nurses use a centrifuge machine that seems impossible: one tube goes from you to it (carrying whole blood), another tube goes from it back to you (carrying plasma depleted blood). The mechanism of Dale. A. Adams keeps the tubes from twisting. Search “antitwister mechanism patent” for a drawing of the mechanism. As for the principle behind the mechanism, see http://Antitwister.ariwatch.com for a PC program where you can adjust every variable imaginable.

replies(1): >>45666738 #
8. justinclift ◴[] No.45666115[source]
Wouldn't a slip ring help here?
replies(1): >>45680780 #
9. Syntonicles ◴[] No.45666304{3}[source]
I can't go into detail, but that's essentially my use case. I have a geodesic dome with a cable running up externally, and would like to run it through a hollow shaft coming in through the top which rotates like a carousel. I'm fairly certain this is precisely what I need.
10. Syntonicles ◴[] No.45666738[source]
What a fascinating project. It looks a real labor of love, and I wish I understood it more deeply. I've been making my own visualization sandboxes like this to explore configuration spaces and groups - but for much simpler, more intuitive physical systems.

I went down a few rabbit holes on the site - is this program also written in Basic?

replies(1): >>45674607 #
11. AugusteDupin ◴[] No.45674607{3}[source]
Yes, specifically the PowerBasic console compiler version 4 (later versions don’t do animation nearly as well). The PowerBasic compilers are no longer being sold and the company appears to be defunct. Anyway, you can do a lot with a good BASIC compiler.
12. meindnoch ◴[] No.45680780{3}[source]
The whole point of the anti-twister mechanism is that it doesn't use a slip ring.