←back to thread

184 points mikhael | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
v7n ◴[] No.45660268[source]
I was immediately reminded of the anti-twist mechanism, perhaps unrelated but "reset rotation, twice/half" comes up there as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-twister_mechanism

replies(4): >>45660536 #>>45661316 #>>45661783 #>>45666297 #
Syntonicles ◴[] No.45661316[source]
What?!

Thank you! I'm working on a robot with a very expensive slip ring, and need to send high fidelity data through it with shielding. I had no idea this was possible this will make things so much easier!

I found a related video you might find interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZvimEf6DFw

I'm currently studying group theory and SO3 rotations (quaternions & matrix groups) and I'm also curious about the connection. I still have a lot to learn but I wouldn't be surprised if the reset rotation is unique, if we abstract away variation.

replies(4): >>45661883 #>>45661989 #>>45662238 #>>45664429 #
meindnoch ◴[] No.45662238[source]
There's a bit of a caveat with the anti-twister mechanism, namely, that the wiring must be loose enough to pass around the supplied rotating part.
replies(3): >>45662570 #>>45662667 #>>45666115 #
justinclift ◴[] No.45666115{3}[source]
Wouldn't a slip ring help here?
replies(1): >>45680780 #
1. meindnoch ◴[] No.45680780{4}[source]
The whole point of the anti-twister mechanism is that it doesn't use a slip ring.