The much more likely hypothesis in my view is that he was helping Trump because of personal conviction (only in small parts motivated by naked self-interest).
You should expect rational billionaires to tend politically right out of pure self-interest and distorted perspective alone; because the universal thing that such parties reliably do when in power is cutting tax burden on the top end.
So this isn't so much of an assumption, as taking him at his word.
What is your actual point? What would he stand in front of a judge for, right now, if Harris had won?