←back to thread

650 points clcaev | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
voidUpdate ◴[] No.45063021[source]
I'm still convinced that it being called "full self driving" is misleading marketing and really needs to stop, since it isn't according to Tesla
replies(7): >>45063088 #>>45063277 #>>45063334 #>>45063570 #>>45063571 #>>45063584 #>>45066589 #
acdha ◴[] No.45063088[source]
Why do you think Musk put so much money into helping Trump win? Tesla was under multiple investigations for safety and unkept promises, and he knew that he would not have leverage to halt those under a Harris administration.
replies(2): >>45063255 #>>45063332 #
myrmidon ◴[] No.45063332[source]
I'm absolutely not a fan of Trump, but this is a highly questionable assumption.

The much more likely hypothesis in my view is that he was helping Trump because of personal conviction (only in small parts motivated by naked self-interest).

You should expect rational billionaires to tend politically right out of pure self-interest and distorted perspective alone; because the universal thing that such parties reliably do when in power is cutting tax burden on the top end.

replies(3): >>45063429 #>>45063451 #>>45066199 #
antonvs ◴[] No.45063429[source]
Musk is on record saying to Tucker Carlson that “If [Trump] loses, I’m fucked.”

So this isn't so much of an assumption, as taking him at his word.

replies(2): >>45063530 #>>45064001 #
unnamed76ri ◴[] No.45063530[source]
The Left was coming after Musk pretty hard before the election. I don’t know the context of the quote you pulled but it’s not hard to see how if Trump lost, there was going to be consequences for Musk.
replies(1): >>45063613 #
Swenrekcah ◴[] No.45063613[source]
He has committed a lot of fraud and was facing consequences for that. That has nothing to do with left or right.
replies(4): >>45063681 #>>45063758 #>>45063864 #>>45064854 #
walls ◴[] No.45063681[source]
It does actually, because only one side is interested in finding or fighting fraud.
replies(2): >>45063801 #>>45063897 #
terminalshort ◴[] No.45063897[source]
Both are interested in finding and fighting fraud, but only from the other side. Leticia James charged Trump with a rack of felonies for putting false info on a loan application. The Trump DOJ charged Leticia James for doing exactly the same. Both sides claim the charges against them are politically motivated and the charges against the other side are completely legitimate.
replies(1): >>45064038 #
1. walls ◴[] No.45064038[source]
> Both sides claim the charges against them are politically motivated and the charges against the other side are completely legitimate.

This is how conservatives keep people going 'both sides!' even though they manufacture whatever is required to be that way.

replies(1): >>45064976 #
2. terminalshort ◴[] No.45064976[source]
Please explain how one person lying on a loan application is manufactured and another person lying on a loan application is a serious felony.
replies(1): >>45070519 #
3. walls ◴[] No.45070519[source]
Scale, intent, history... so many things make two crimes that sound the same, not the same.