←back to thread

112 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
lokar ◴[] No.42200889[source]
I see apple as like LVMH, but for phones. It has a minority of overall sales, but a majority of the “luxury” part of the market. This gives them influence over the whole market, but not a real monopoly.
replies(7): >>42200914 #>>42201067 #>>42201094 #>>42201131 #>>42201148 #>>42201290 #>>42210472 #
dismalaf ◴[] No.42201067[source]
It's strange how they've convinced people that, considering there's nothing at all luxurious about their products, not even the price...
replies(1): >>42201442 #
bobbylarrybobby ◴[] No.42201442[source]
What's luxurious about Apple products is that they tend to respect your time
replies(6): >>42201472 #>>42201662 #>>42202285 #>>42202412 #>>42202452 #>>42203585 #
makeitdouble ◴[] No.42201662[source]
Does your time feel respected when you're leaving the Kindle app to open a web browser, search for the book that was next in the series, buy it, and get back to your Kindle app to continue reading ?
replies(1): >>42204357 #
stogot ◴[] No.42204357[source]
Ouch, this just happened to me the other day and it was irritating that Apple forces other companies to force users to do a dance
replies(1): >>42204998 #
slowmovintarget ◴[] No.42204998[source]
They don't force it. Amazon, for example, just doesn't want to pay the 30% platform cut. Understandable, but not force, just deterrence.
replies(3): >>42206105 #>>42208558 #>>42220928 #
1. stogot ◴[] No.42220928[source]
They shouldn’t have to pay for something I buy in a store on their app. Apple doesn’t get to own the entire economy just because they make an operating system