Most active commenters
  • flawsofar(4)
  • segasaturn(3)

←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 16 comments | | HN request time: 1.678s | source | bottom
Show context
vkou ◴[] No.40213662[source]
It's actually wild what the executive can get done in an election year... With the side effect of dangling bait for legislators to take a contrarian, nationally unpopular position.
replies(5): >>40213870 #>>40213897 #>>40214987 #>>40215665 #>>40216313 #
segasaturn ◴[] No.40213870[source]
Election year and not to mention that the President's numbers are in shambles with younger voters. This move feels extremely transparent to me.
replies(5): >>40213915 #>>40213949 #>>40214004 #>>40214706 #>>40214765 #
1. flawsofar ◴[] No.40213949[source]
Well I mean: doing things that people want them to do to get elected. Not the worst problem?
replies(2): >>40214038 #>>40214445 #
2. segasaturn ◴[] No.40214038[source]
Of course not, that's how democracy works!

My actual issue with this is:

a) it should have been done sooner. Waiting until $election_year to do something popular has severely damaged the growth of cannabis industry

and b) it's another executive branch rule by decree that could be reversed as soon as 6 months from now after election day.

replies(3): >>40214108 #>>40214154 #>>40214593 #
3. flawsofar ◴[] No.40214108[source]
Ah, I agree. It is a good move with a side of bullshit.
4. 2OEH8eoCRo0 ◴[] No.40214154[source]
> it should have been done sooner.

Not everyone agrees though. I don't want it legalized or normalized more.

replies(3): >>40214283 #>>40214359 #>>40216546 #
5. ◴[] No.40214283{3}[source]
6. itishappy ◴[] No.40214359{3}[source]
What about reclassification?
7. vuln ◴[] No.40214445[source]
It’s pandering and on the edge of buying votes. Unlike Student Loan “forgiveness” which was a direct purchase of a vote.

And no I doubt this will rouse the pot smokers to vote, perhaps mail in, as they don’t have to do actually anything.

replies(2): >>40214528 #>>40214877 #
8. flawsofar ◴[] No.40214528[source]
If everyone buys votes using one issue or another, using cannabis to buy votes should be the least concern of anyone.

While you can make some amount of case that the timing makes it a manipulation, is this really the manipulation that bothers you?

I would rather there be no manipulations. But in a country that divides itself on infantile identity politics, fight fire with fire.

It is not a fair game. You can’t demand perfect intentions around this issue when politics is full of much worse actors.

replies(1): >>40215294 #
9. sevagh ◴[] No.40214593[source]
>as severely damaged the growth of cannabis industry

Do you own weed stocks or something? How is the growth of the cannabis industry supposed to be the mandate of a government?

replies(1): >>40214820 #
10. segasaturn ◴[] No.40214820{3}[source]
Regulation shouldn't cause harm for causing harm's sake. We already know prohibition doesn't work, so why did they drag their feet on repealing regulation that is both harmful and ineffective, is my concern.

Also to answer your question about weed stocks: I used to own cannabis stocks but dumped them about a year ago. Big mistake! They've doubled in price over the last week presumably from this news.

11. 7jjjjjjj ◴[] No.40214877[source]
It's wild to me that people think "buying votes" is a bad thing. The whole point of democracy is to align the interests of the state's leaders to its population. If anything, politicians don't buy votes often enough!
replies(1): >>40215346 #
12. vuln ◴[] No.40215294{3}[source]
The timing is complete bullshit. Politicians “pocket” issues like this and pull them out during an election year “look how much I care about you!!! Vote for me!!!” They could have and should have done this a very long time ago.

It’s obvious to everyone that the democrats are losing their bread a butter voters, young people and black folks. This gets waved around for the nth time and everyone gets excited.

replies(1): >>40216171 #
13. cheeseomlit ◴[] No.40215346{3}[source]
Politician runs on a platform of 'Hey 51% of the population, if you vote for me I'll take the other 49%'s money and give it to you!', proceeds to win by 2%. Democracy in action!
14. flawsofar ◴[] No.40216171{4}[source]
are you really going on a downvote revenge spree? lol
replies(1): >>40216237 #
15. philipkglass ◴[] No.40216237{5}[source]
On HN you can't downvote a direct reply to your own comment, so vuln did not downvote your reply.
16. kbelder ◴[] No.40216546{3}[source]
I wish it was completely legal and completely non-normalized.