←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
vkou ◴[] No.40213662[source]
It's actually wild what the executive can get done in an election year... With the side effect of dangling bait for legislators to take a contrarian, nationally unpopular position.
replies(5): >>40213870 #>>40213897 #>>40214987 #>>40215665 #>>40216313 #
segasaturn ◴[] No.40213870[source]
Election year and not to mention that the President's numbers are in shambles with younger voters. This move feels extremely transparent to me.
replies(5): >>40213915 #>>40213949 #>>40214004 #>>40214706 #>>40214765 #
flawsofar ◴[] No.40213949[source]
Well I mean: doing things that people want them to do to get elected. Not the worst problem?
replies(2): >>40214038 #>>40214445 #
segasaturn ◴[] No.40214038[source]
Of course not, that's how democracy works!

My actual issue with this is:

a) it should have been done sooner. Waiting until $election_year to do something popular has severely damaged the growth of cannabis industry

and b) it's another executive branch rule by decree that could be reversed as soon as 6 months from now after election day.

replies(3): >>40214108 #>>40214154 #>>40214593 #
2OEH8eoCRo0 ◴[] No.40214154[source]
> it should have been done sooner.

Not everyone agrees though. I don't want it legalized or normalized more.

replies(3): >>40214283 #>>40214359 #>>40216546 #
1. kbelder ◴[] No.40216546[source]
I wish it was completely legal and completely non-normalized.