←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
vkou ◴[] No.40213662[source]
It's actually wild what the executive can get done in an election year... With the side effect of dangling bait for legislators to take a contrarian, nationally unpopular position.
replies(5): >>40213870 #>>40213897 #>>40214987 #>>40215665 #>>40216313 #
segasaturn ◴[] No.40213870[source]
Election year and not to mention that the President's numbers are in shambles with younger voters. This move feels extremely transparent to me.
replies(5): >>40213915 #>>40213949 #>>40214004 #>>40214706 #>>40214765 #
flawsofar ◴[] No.40213949[source]
Well I mean: doing things that people want them to do to get elected. Not the worst problem?
replies(2): >>40214038 #>>40214445 #
vuln ◴[] No.40214445[source]
It’s pandering and on the edge of buying votes. Unlike Student Loan “forgiveness” which was a direct purchase of a vote.

And no I doubt this will rouse the pot smokers to vote, perhaps mail in, as they don’t have to do actually anything.

replies(2): >>40214528 #>>40214877 #
7jjjjjjj ◴[] No.40214877[source]
It's wild to me that people think "buying votes" is a bad thing. The whole point of democracy is to align the interests of the state's leaders to its population. If anything, politicians don't buy votes often enough!
replies(1): >>40215346 #
1. cheeseomlit ◴[] No.40215346[source]
Politician runs on a platform of 'Hey 51% of the population, if you vote for me I'll take the other 49%'s money and give it to you!', proceeds to win by 2%. Democracy in action!