Most active commenters
  • IndySun(6)
  • personlurking(5)
  • ghaff(5)
  • oscargrouch(4)

←back to thread

527 points optimalsolver | 44 comments | | HN request time: 1.747s | source | bottom
1. personlurking ◴[] No.25975086[source]
I realize this is a site about the past, but I really hope this is the future. I want an internet of specialty sites, browsable curations, diversity of offering, freedom of choice, and full of the quirky/unusual. It might have to do with growing up in the 90s and experiencing that kind of world wide web, w/o walled gardens.

Several years back, perhaps even via an HN post or comment, I came across a blog, hosted on a university network (IIRC, perhaps related to media studies). The page consisted of a group of possibly graduate students contributing some of the weirdest and most obscure media I've ever seen online. Nothing obscene and nothing seemingly new/current, so it was rather hipster in that sense, but I kick myself for not having saved the URL.

Nothing says I need to use walled gardens or get my news from the big networks, but I often feel I'm being pointed that way. In the end, I just want something different than what's usually being served up.

(It doesn't escape me that this 90's TV site is full of walled garden/big network type content of the time)

replies(10): >>25976050 #>>25976617 #>>25976872 #>>25976885 #>>25977503 #>>25978623 #>>25978899 #>>25979171 #>>25979914 #>>25980252 #
2. oscargrouch ◴[] No.25976050[source]
Human societies must have a free road to organize themselves and grow in a organic way.

Unfortunately our virtual world are built in a way to addict us with content we create ourselves giving a few monopolists total control of our virtual presence.

I'm boarded in a project to think in another approach, in a way the give us more power and freedom to shape our virtual collective consciousness..

Without us figuring out a way to get us all out of this trap, i don't see a very bright future for us, and the current political and social status-quo are a clear sign of what all this is making to us.

The power and control is too concentrated in the hands of a few, and its easier than ever to pull all the strings from a couple of places.

Eg. If we have a dozens of key people to agree into some plan to permanent power and control, it will be impossible for us to take our freedom back, of course it will not look like any sort of government that we have witnessed before.

I know this is a conspiracy theory and i dont like it myself, but its pretty possible and easier to happen with all the technological status-quo and tech monopolies we have nowadays.

replies(2): >>25976068 #>>25976108 #
3. acatsdream ◴[] No.25976068[source]
Let us be stronger.
replies(1): >>25976160 #
4. jdkee ◴[] No.25976108[source]
"Human societies must have a free road to organize themselves and grow in a organic way."

How does this happen in the monoculture of the global internet, where local heterogenous subcultures (music, art, cuisine, traditions, languages) are eradicated?

replies(1): >>25976253 #
5. oscargrouch ◴[] No.25976253{3}[source]
The globalization movement that started in the 90's, have no way back. It was the right direction to take anyway..

The question is how much resilient we are to create and cultivate local stuff over the global noise.. I'm pretty sure that despite the difficulty of the task, we can handle it..

But we must have the proper tools to make it flourish.. but my fear is that while we are figuring out all this, some big players decide to replay the titanic wars devouring their children before they get too powerful..

Its not happening yet, because there are barely no threats, but once they start to show up and become trends, i don't expect them to play nice.

And with all the power and control "they" have, it will not be like any old industry vs. newcomers we have witnessed before.

(BTW the matrix app being kicked out of peoples cell phones might be a sign of what will come)

replies(2): >>25977224 #>>25978245 #
6. rosstex ◴[] No.25976617[source]
If you do find the link, I want to know!
7. melomal ◴[] No.25976872[source]
Do you not feel that the streaming options are up to scratch? There's so many now, from science doc specific (Nebula and Curiosity stream - I was eager to start with these but inevitably was let down with these 'speciality options') to anime too.

Personally, streaming has now also ruined watching the TV/movies for me.

Since my TV burned itself I've had a non-smart TV and it's actually really refreshing to have such minimal choice and be walled in as such. I end up watching films and actually enjoying them, not dealing with FOMO and wondering if there's something better).

replies(1): >>25977953 #
8. egeozcan ◴[] No.25976875{6}[source]
> The average IQ sample here is higher (period).

If you asked me, that'd be my guess as well, but saying it such a way that it projects hopelessness for the rest of the humanity is a bit too much :)

Narcissism is dangerous as it tends to create and feed extremist communities. For an example, see any political forum full with extremists (these days it's hard to find any without) and observe how often they call themselves intelligent (or woke, or whatever fancy words they use to work around the obviousness of self-flattery).

replies(1): >>25976994 #
9. onion2k ◴[] No.25976885[source]
I want an internet of specialty sites, browsable curations, diversity of offering, freedom of choice, and full of the quirky/unusual.

You can have that. All you need to do is make sure the developers who make those sites get rich. Find the sites and tell your friends about them. Subscribe to their work. Buy their merch. Click on the ads. Pay them. Then everyone else will see that sort of site making bank, and they'll follow along with similar things.

The only reason the web is what it is today is because the money went to the walled gardens and social media sites. To change that, change where the money goes.

replies(2): >>25977213 #>>25978738 #
10. oscargrouch ◴[] No.25976994{7}[source]
I get what you are saying, but there are a couple of points that make this different..

First, of course is a subjective experience and therefore prone to error, but i came to this conclusion by observing this community over a long period of time.

Second, the communities you mention have mostly common ideological guidelines and goals, working like a cult or a religion. Therefore there's this feeling of belonging. HN is far away from that as people here have all sorts of different beliefs, background, etc. It's an heterogeneous community that will hardly agree on anything.

There's also no sense of belonging here, to a group, or a brand. etc..

There's no HNer, not a club, or have a card in the sorts of "Mensa" that you would proudly show to tell how smart you are.. as most of us are anonymous here.

So i don't think the patterns apply here. I think some people spend too much time on toxic social networks and suddenly start to see 33 all over even when the number is 21, because his neurons are seeing the same pattern too many times with these algorithms that are optimized to turn us all into neurotics.

11. IndySun ◴[] No.25977213[source]
"...To change that, change where the money goes..."

Creative work is currently having its sources of income decimated, from all sides. We should get used to reminiscing.

replies(1): >>25977955 #
12. IndySun ◴[] No.25977224{4}[source]
> The globalization movement that started in the 90's<

What was this?

13. FearNotDaniel ◴[] No.25977503[source]
It's still REALLY EASY to make websites that look and feel exactly how you want, just like it was back then. Server space is dirt cheap. Anyone can register a domain, dirt cheap. HTML and CSS* still work without any JS whatsoever. And if you feel the need to use JS, it is absolutely not necessary to get sucked into the world of "modern" web development that suddenly requires 1000s of dependencies and a complex build process.

Be the change you want to see in the world. Get creative. Tell your friends.

* to be fair, CSS is possibly where the rot started to set in... some poorly thought-out design choices from 20 years ago are still haunting us. But stick to the basics and focus on the content instead, it still gets the job done.

14. personlurking ◴[] No.25977953[source]
I'm somewhat of an oddball in terms of content preferences. Sure, I have Netflix and use it, but during the past 20 years, over 50% of the tv/film content I watch is foreign (I'm American). I keep lists from my favorite countries and ask foreigners what I should be watching. What would surprise me is finding Netflix-like services that curate the best [insert genre].

So far, I've come across MhZ Choice (for EU shows, with subtitles), FlixOlé (for Spanishf films, no subtitles), Wlext (foreign tv shows...pirated). Also, I recommend using a VPN for Netflix to access different shows and films, depending on the country you choose. The other day I found myself watching a Chinese action film that only had Italian subtitles (luckily my Italian is up to scratch).

With music, my tastes are boarderless and timeless. At any moment, I'll put on 13th century Iberian cantigas, Latin motets, folkloric Sardinian, 90's French indie, 1970s Congolese rumba, modern Ivory Coast reggae, South African Xhosa pop, Indian mantras, Peruvian ethno-techno, and the list goes on.

But yes, the plethora of options is, at the same time, wonderful and dreadful. I tried to sit down and start reading a semi-dense physical book the other day and it's like my mind was too fried to focus due to having just got off the internet.

replies(2): >>25983525 #>>26011565 #
15. dewey ◴[] No.25977955{3}[source]
> Creative work is currently having its sources of income decimated, from all sides. We should get used to reminiscing.

This is just anecdotal but I see a lot of very niche creative people making money that they wouldn't have made before through YouTube, Discord, Patreon, Gumroad etc.

I think the opposite is true, while in the past it was maybe PayPal there's a lot of ways to make money online that's very approachable for everyone.

replies(2): >>25978014 #>>25978751 #
16. IndySun ◴[] No.25978014{4}[source]
The niche stuff is definitely happening. As are new ways to monetize; but online only. What is certainly being eroded that cannot be achieved online is live performance. Include in that phrase what you will. But those opportunities are currently almost zero internationally. What the long term effects of this are is hard to predict but human to human emotional contact is imperative to our survival.
replies(1): >>25979075 #
17. personlurking ◴[] No.25978024{7}[source]
I think the user you're referring to is merely making an observation, not speaking out of malevolence nor arrogance. I was also lurking (my username checks out) for years before I made an account, and I've always felt that HN has one of the smartest groups of people on the web.
18. nobody9999 ◴[] No.25978245{4}[source]
>(BTW the matrix app being kicked out of peoples cell phones might be a sign of what will come)

Let's be precise here. The Element app was suspended from the Play Store (and restored in less than 24 hours) It was most certainly not removed from peoples' phones.

We have serious issues with the centralization of network services and we should scream loudly about it and look for ways to diminish the power that comes with that centralization.

However, making specious claims like that doesn't help. It just makes those who rail against the concentrated power of these big corporations seem deranged.

There are plenty of real issues to rail against without making shit up.

replies(1): >>25980372 #
19. PH01 ◴[] No.25978623[source]
Did the site have a video stream in the centre and a chat box below it? There were often streams of storms filmed from a beach front location?
replies(1): >>25978673 #
20. personlurking ◴[] No.25978673[source]
Not that I recall, no. I only looked at it once, for maybe 20 minutes. It was more like a blog (ie, scroll bar, multiple entries).
replies(1): >>25978710 #
21. PH01 ◴[] No.25978710{3}[source]
Was a long shot. I'm also searching for an obscure site I was almost certainly linked to from here.
22. ghaff ◴[] No.25978738[source]
Possibly an unpopular opinion but I'd argue that, in the main, the people creating interesting stuff as a sideline never got rich. Maybe it's a side effect of the startup and side-hustle mentality here but I'd argue that maybe discussions about these sorts of things emphasize monetization too much.
replies(2): >>25979639 #>>25984023 #
23. Kye ◴[] No.25978751{4}[source]
It's still very hard to actually bridge the gap between putting something out there and getting people to pay for it. All those platforms did was expand the lucky few from .1% to 1% of people trying. A big jump, but few people make enough to cover the costs, much less live on it.
replies(2): >>25978921 #>>25978938 #
24. karaokeyoga ◴[] No.25978899[source]
… but I kick myself for not having saved the URL …

Maybe https://neave.tv/?

replies(1): >>25980096 #
25. IndySun ◴[] No.25978921{5}[source]
Kye, Completely agree with this. Making it big as a creative remains elusive for but a few, and may actually be harder today due to your point (this plus the fact that powerful creative tools are in so many more people hands thus we have a glut/logjam of talent being overlooked).
26. ghaff ◴[] No.25978938{5}[source]
Arguably a lot of people buy into the buzz around becoming a Tik-Tok, YouTube, or whatever star when the reality is that it's about as likely for most as becoming a Hollywood star is.

Whatever the form, content by itself just doesn't pay a lot for most and never has. I just finished a new edition of a book of mine. It's valuable for "branding" (ugh term I know). But I'll directly make less money than from cranking out a blog post for some company.

replies(1): >>25979799 #
27. scollet ◴[] No.25979075{5}[source]
"Live" as in-the-moment or "Live" as being in the same vicinity/venue?

The former is still very much booming, and I don't see why the latter would go anywhere.

replies(1): >>25979749 #
28. tiborsaas ◴[] No.25979171[source]
In this age of "infinite" content curation is really important. Inspired by the 90's MTV experience I've built https://humanmusic.tv/ to replicate that but with indie music from the last 10 years.

I'm also running a web crawler to discover fresh music videos from various music blogs.

replies(1): >>25979508 #
29. api ◴[] No.25979508[source]
I wonder if a curated directory like the original 90s Yahoo! could work and experience a renaissance today? I could see that being more useful than search, honestly. Search today is just polluted with SEO trash.
replies(2): >>25979553 #>>25980781 #
30. ghaff ◴[] No.25979553{3}[source]
Define "work." A curated directory for some niche topic would definitely be of interest to people involved with that niche topic. And, depending on the topic, it might even serve as a decently profitable sideline for someone. But it certainly wouldn't be Yahoo! v. 2.
31. onion2k ◴[] No.25979639{3}[source]
Maybe people who see moderate success turn it in to a full time job, and it stops being a side hustle.
replies(1): >>25979800 #
32. IndySun ◴[] No.25979749{6}[source]
""Live" as in-the-moment or "Live" as being in the same vicinity/venue?"

In the flesh live, people together experiencing something collectively.

"I don't see why the latter would go anywhere"

There's an ongoing pandemic and during it the vast majority of venues where people can experience performance or sport collectively are and remain closed. During this time the income normally generated has understandably ceased. Many places may remain permanently closed, including historical outdoor events.

I do eventually expect a move toward normality but it's going to take many years. In the meantime we can add online live & reminiscing in lieu of the 'real thing'.

33. IndySun ◴[] No.25979799{6}[source]
Ghaff, some good points too. And am I reading you right; you're saying you could (are) potentially earn more from writing a (paid) blog post than from your own book?
replies(1): >>25979856 #
34. ghaff ◴[] No.25979800{4}[source]
Sure. There are best selling authors who started out writing in the evenings. My point though is that it's a very small proportion of those who try who parlay music/fiction writing/video/etc. into even a median household income full-time job (say $50K/year in the US).
35. ghaff ◴[] No.25979856{7}[source]
Yes. Exactly.

There are a bunch of reputational benefits to certain types of book writing which (probably) lead to significant career/comp benefits. But the direct money can be less than what companies will pay for a ghostwritten content marketing-type blog. Or even whatever a lot of salaried people earn for doing that sort of work on company time. There's a reason a lot of "creatives" end up working for corporate product companies as their day job.

36. sogen ◴[] No.25979914[source]
maybe https://www.kickscondor.com ?
37. personlurking ◴[] No.25980096[source]
That's a great site! Love it

But unfortunately, no. The one I remember wasn't TV-based. It was more like a normal blog but hosted on a university domain, iirc.

38. fwilliams ◴[] No.25980252[source]
It’s not the site you’re looking for, but I found https://poolside.fm recently and it’s become one of those quirky corners of the internet that I have come to enjoy. I definitely miss the days of discovering weird specialty sites, and poolside gave me a bit of that new site discovery rush (also the music is great).
replies(1): >>25991261 #
39. oscargrouch ◴[] No.25980372{5}[source]
So I'm glad this is not the case yet, but Apple specifically have been doing this more prominently than others and it starts with platform handicap (for instance make it almost impossible to create applications in other ways beyond their proprietary API aiming things like the Web).

FAANG's are feeling that the antitrust guillotine is near their heads, so things will be a little quiet for now, but once the dust have settled they will probably keep doing what they were doing before, unless of course a proper legal framework come to rescue.

But as the political class have more urgent matters to take care of, i think this legal sophistication we urgently need will not be a priority.

40. tiborsaas ◴[] No.25980781{3}[source]
Ironically, for SEO purposes, to generate backlinks, there are endless directory websites out there which look like what you just described.

To make it successful, some kind of authority should be present in the sauce.

41. anthk ◴[] No.25983525{3}[source]
> The other day I found myself watching a Chinese action film that only had Italian subtitles

https://opensubtitles.org

42. joshspankit ◴[] No.25984023{3}[source]
Personally I feel like there are a lot of important and opposing conversations about the interaction between authentic creativity and money.

One of the biggest reasons I’m a proponent of Universal Basic Income is that I want creative people to be able to create without having to fall prey to things like cutting out their medium in order to make sure they can eat and have a place to live.

However: we are currently within a capitalist society, and because of that we have to think of how we can financially enable the art and culture that we want to see more of.

This is a deeply interwoven and complex topic, but at the end of the day I just want to see interesting stuff and know that the people creating it are better because of it.

43. zomg ◴[] No.25991261[source]
i just downloaded the app. this is amazing, thank you for posting!
44. melomal ◴[] No.26011565{3}[source]
> The other day I found myself watching a Chinese action film that only had Italian subtitles

The good old days of going down a Youtube rabbit hole :)