←back to thread

126 points petermcneeley | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.468s | source
Show context
appreciatorBus ◴[] No.46177701[source]
> "We don't want to spend half a year of our lives locked up in barracks, being trained in drill and obedience and learning to kill," the organisers of the protests wrote in a statement posted on social media. "War offers no prospects for the future and destroys our livelihoods."

Is the idea that it’s better for your livelihood to just start learning how speak Russian now?

replies(22): >>46177893 #>>46177896 #>>46177900 #>>46177918 #>>46177951 #>>46177965 #>>46178025 #>>46178027 #>>46178156 #>>46178204 #>>46178403 #>>46179097 #>>46179705 #>>46179889 #>>46179918 #>>46179969 #>>46180303 #>>46180543 #>>46180807 #>>46181263 #>>46182810 #>>46197927 #
frmersdog ◴[] No.46178403[source]
History shows that the best way to resist, in these circumstances, might be to let them in, and then blow them up in the streets and countryside until they leave. It's cheaper and (morbidly enough) probably has a lower human cost.
replies(2): >>46179569 #>>46179575 #
1. Hackbraten ◴[] No.46179569[source]
Wouldn't that require military training, too?
replies(1): >>46183415 #
2. frmersdog ◴[] No.46183415[source]
Sure, but it doesn't require throwing young people who don't care to fight into pitched battle meat grinders.

Obviously, either path is undesirable. It would be nice if we could use some of those "undermining and overthrowing regimes we don't like" expertise on actual threats instead of countries that just want to nationalize their resources.