←back to thread

160 points felipap | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.928s | source | bottom
1. aesbetic ◴[] No.45649915[source]
In the first lecture, Abelson says Computer Science is neither a science nor is it really about computers. Considering the current ML paradigm, maybe CS has finally earned its name as a science.
replies(3): >>45650753 #>>45651707 #>>45655133 #
2. gjvc ◴[] No.45650753[source]
quite the opposite
3. bmitc ◴[] No.45651707[source]
What about the current ML paradigm makes it a science?
replies(2): >>45652704 #>>45656131 #
4. computerfriend ◴[] No.45652704[source]
Observing and testing phenomena we don't understand.
replies(1): >>45652919 #
5. mcmoor ◴[] No.45652919{3}[source]
I guess it's been progressing from being math, to natural science, to social science
6. postexitus ◴[] No.45655133[source]
It is one of the most memorable first lectures in the history of Computer Science.
7. aesbetic ◴[] No.45656131[source]
We have “laws” and routinely conduct “experiments” which are kind of unheard of in CS.
replies(1): >>45665253 #
8. bmitc ◴[] No.45665253{3}[source]
Do you have any references I could learn about these types of laws and experiments?