←back to thread

160 points felipap | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.603s | source
Show context
aesbetic ◴[] No.45649915[source]
In the first lecture, Abelson says Computer Science is neither a science nor is it really about computers. Considering the current ML paradigm, maybe CS has finally earned its name as a science.
replies(3): >>45650753 #>>45651707 #>>45655133 #
bmitc ◴[] No.45651707[source]
What about the current ML paradigm makes it a science?
replies(2): >>45652704 #>>45656131 #
1. aesbetic ◴[] No.45656131[source]
We have “laws” and routinely conduct “experiments” which are kind of unheard of in CS.
replies(1): >>45665253 #
2. bmitc ◴[] No.45665253[source]
Do you have any references I could learn about these types of laws and experiments?