←back to thread

160 points felipap | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
aesbetic ◴[] No.45649915[source]
In the first lecture, Abelson says Computer Science is neither a science nor is it really about computers. Considering the current ML paradigm, maybe CS has finally earned its name as a science.
replies(3): >>45650753 #>>45651707 #>>45655133 #
bmitc ◴[] No.45651707[source]
What about the current ML paradigm makes it a science?
replies(2): >>45652704 #>>45656131 #
computerfriend ◴[] No.45652704[source]
Observing and testing phenomena we don't understand.
replies(1): >>45652919 #
1. mcmoor ◴[] No.45652919[source]
I guess it's been progressing from being math, to natural science, to social science