←back to thread

65 points doener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
m101 ◴[] No.45345745[source]
Electric car sales were 20% of all sales, so 26% increase is hardly a "surge". Going from a low base this is supposed to be higher.

I think what we are seeing is that electric car interest isn't as strong as governments hoped for. I used to own an electric car now I'm back to a hybrid.

Q4 sales in the US will be interesting because of the removal of the tax credits and the increasing electricity prices that AI is causing. Low prices of fuel in the US means that it's not exactly cheaper to run an electric car in the US.

replies(7): >>45345832 #>>45345912 #>>45345925 #>>45345936 #>>45345937 #>>45346714 #>>45349375 #
Sharlin ◴[] No.45345937[source]
Well, in this economical situation it absolutely isn't in most people's immediate plans to buy a new expensive car.

But yes, also, the naive hope of many politicians was that the huge, thorny issue that is traffic emissions would just resolve itself by everybody magically switching to EVs, because actually effective measures to curb emissions are rather unpopular.

replies(1): >>45346064 #
storus ◴[] No.45346064[source]
Much of PM2.5 particles is generated by tires. EVs are much harder on tires, often needing tire replacement after just 1 year. So on one hand, you get rid of PM2.5 from fossil fuels, on the other hand you increase tire PM2.5 five fold.
replies(3): >>45346116 #>>45346566 #>>45346737 #
1. rmu09 ◴[] No.45346566[source]
You also get rid of brake dust (for the most part).

This study https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/report... (page 95) sees nowhere near 5 fold increase of particles from tire wear with EVs, for lightweight EVs you get a significant reduction in overall particle emissions.