←back to thread

Are touchscreens in cars dangerous?

(www.economist.com)
238 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | 20 Sep 25 15:57 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
jleyank ◴[20 Sep 25 16:03 UTC] No.45314479[source]▶
They're quite difficult to use without looking at them, and I've got better things to look at while driving. Better buttons that don't move and have "presence" than I can feel without looking.
replies(2): >>45314754 #>>45314881 #
dazc ◴[20 Sep 25 16:27 UTC] No.45314754[source]▶
Physical volume adjustment buttons on the steering wheel are about the only control I feel comfortable using whilst the car is moving. Anything more complex with a touch-screen interface is an accident waiting to happen.
replies(1): >>45314856 #
amluto ◴[20 Sep 25 16:35 UTC] No.45314856[source]▶
What about physical buttons off the wheel? A well-designed car might have quite a few: window controls, sound system volume knob, temperature up-down, etc.

In my first car, I could operate the windows, climate control and sound system without taking my eyes off the road at all, although I had to glance briefly at the (fixed) display to see what radio station I was tuned to if it wasn’t obvious.

replies(2): >>45314920 #>>45315056 #
1. dazc ◴[20 Sep 25 16:43 UTC] No.45314920[source]▶
Well, yes, there is the obvious stuff although I could say opening windows is not entirely simple unless I'm fully opening or closing.

Old-school radios were a lot more user-friendly with preset station buttons and a tactile volume control that actually felt like it was connected to something.