←back to thread

245 points rntn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.435s | source
Show context
walterbell ◴[] No.45167801[source]
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevemcdowell/2025/08/31/broadc...

> Many mid-market and regional operators view the new [subscription] structure as untenable and are actively exploring alternatives.. Nutanix emerged early as the leading competitive alternative to VMware.. over 2,700 new customers.. driven by organizations fleeing VMware's new pricing model.. [including] more than 50 Global 2000 companies, representing major enterprises willing to undertake complex, multi-year infrastructure overhauls.. With VMware serving approximately 200,000 customers globally, Nutanix sees most of the migration opportunity still ahead.

replies(1): >>45167849 #
alephnerd ◴[] No.45167849[source]
> Many mid-market and regional operators

These aren't Broadcom's ICPs.

> Nutanix

Good for Nutanix. Market segmentation exists for a reason.

The article is also written by Steve McDowell, who's analyst firm (NAND Research) is sponsored by Nutanix [0][1]

Welcome to Enterprise Sales.

[0] - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=93FbVZGDXoY

[1] - https://www.nutanix.com/theforecastbynutanix/technology/hype...

replies(1): >>45167986 #
walterbell ◴[] No.45167986[source]
The article mentions several VMware alternatives:

  - RedHat OpenShift (k8s)
  - Scale Computing HC3
  - Wind River Cloud 
  - public cloud providers
Any other alternatives?
replies(5): >>45168266 #>>45168267 #>>45168307 #>>45171051 #>>45175357 #
sherr ◴[] No.45168267[source]
Xen is still around, including an open-source version. It's not as visible as it used to be but works e.g. XenServer (https://www.xenserver.com/editions). I'd look at this over VMWare anyday.
replies(1): >>45168404 #
1. stephen_g ◴[] No.45168404[source]
When I was looking at solutions, most of what I found seemed to indicate Xen is waning in popularity. I considered XCP-ng but since KVM seems to be more preferred now, I ended up going with Proxmox for a few small work (3-5 hosts) and home (1 and 3 host) systems. It’s actually been rock-solid, basically had zero problems with it.
replies(1): >>45168931 #
2. walterbell ◴[] No.45168931[source]
> rock-solid

Perl FTW, https://github.com/proxmox/pve-common