I should have loved electrical engineering

(blog.tdhttt.com)

157 points tdhttt | 1 comments | 01 Sep 25 09:12 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

ryandrake ◴[04 Sep 25 10:57 UTC] No.45125823[source]▶

The EE component of my CSE degree felt like a math degree in disguise. Calculus, linear algebra, differential equations, discrete mathematics... It was a long time ago but I remember it as three years of math prerequisites and Maxwell’s equations and then finally we could learn what a MOSFET is. Absolutely terrible. I just want to learn how circuits work and how to build a guitar amp! But noooooo I need to learn how to solve partial differential equations, which I’ve done zero times in the field.

replies(6): >>45126057 #>>45126427 #>>45127690 #>>45127823 #>>45132453 #>>45139622 #

kalinkochnev ◴[04 Sep 25 12:21 UTC] No.45126427[source]▶

>>45125823 #

I agree that is excessive. But I would hate equally, if not more, learning with magic rules delivered by the professor in the sky. The info doesn't stick for me unless I understand the intuition behind the reasoning.

replies(1): >>45126494 #

1. mynameajeff ◴[04 Sep 25 12:28 UTC] No.45126494[source]▶

>>45126427 #

Yeah I had a magic-rules-first style experience in my EE program and it really didn't work for me at all. The nebulous reasoning made it for me where I just really couldn't internalize the pretty basic "rules" because I couldn't help but mess myself up overthinking the more abstract modes of conceptualizing everything which just confused me more. I'm thankful because it gave me the opportunity to quickly learn that I was a lot better at code than circuits, I probably would've been screwed if it took me that long to get to that point in my educations, but I will say the magic rules just did not work for me personally as a way to understand things. I'm sure others would do a lot better at just jumping right in though.

↑