←back to thread

We're Joining OpenAI

(www.alexcodes.app)
192 points liurenju | 1 comments | 03 Sep 25 18:38 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
CyberMacGyver ◴[03 Sep 25 20:45 UTC] No.45120228[source]▶
At this rate it’s better to start a company and get aquihired vs applying and getting hired.

Seems like OpenAI speed ran through the Facebook phase and are out of ideas

replies(5): >>45120368 #>>45120639 #>>45123216 #>>45124631 #>>45125345 #
kridsdale3 ◴[03 Sep 25 21:00 UTC] No.45120368[source]▶
Au contraire, based on their recent hires, they're just beginning their Facebook phase. Expect to see a lot of ads 2 years from now, and expect to see a LOT of money being made by the company a year after that.

If they can maintain runway until then.

replies(13): >>45120439 #>>45120462 #>>45120737 #>>45120923 #>>45121451 #>>45123833 #>>45124176 #>>45124207 #>>45124568 #>>45125196 #>>45127156 #>>45128868 #>>45129566 #
dfsegoat ◴[03 Sep 25 21:10 UTC] No.45120439[source]▶
> Expect to see a lot of ads 2 years from now

I think I am just slow today - but could you please elaborate?

replies(2): >>45120474 #>>45120622 #
bobbiechen ◴[03 Sep 25 21:30 UTC] No.45120622[source]▶
I wrote about this idea here: https://digitalseams.com/blog/the-ai-lifestyle-subsidy-is-go...

Quick summary, I believe consumer AI experiences will feature ads because the profit opportunity is too large and company valuations depend on it. The hiring of Fidji Simo (ads at Facebook) at OpenAI + and just this week, Vijaye Raji/Statsig also point that way.

replies(5): >>45120692 #>>45120726 #>>45120742 #>>45123113 #>>45130753 #
rhubarbtree ◴[03 Sep 25 21:45 UTC] No.45120726{3}[source]▶
We’re in a golden period where AI results are ad-free.

One thing I’ve been doing is querying and storing results. For example, “what are the best books on X topic” for every topic I can possibly think that I may want to read about in the future.

I’ve found the results to be amazing if you give a sufficiently detailed prompt. I have enough reading to see me through to exit.

replies(5): >>45120763 #>>45122317 #>>45123511 #>>45124818 #>>45125672 #
1. Larrikin ◴[04 Sep 25 04:14 UTC] No.45123511{4}[source]▶
I've already started getting results infiltrated by SEO but for AI. Deep research did return seemingly a top book when I was looking into Ansible. I independently verified it with my own searching in a few different places.

But the other recommendations seemed like crap and when I followed the sources they seemed like AI generated garbage for AI that I couldn't find doing my normal searching.