←back to thread

181 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jelder ◴[] No.45116692[source]
What it actually looks like: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/B612
replies(6): >>45116769 #>>45116814 #>>45116918 #>>45116925 #>>45117098 #>>45117894 #
ShakataGaNai ◴[] No.45116918[source]
Thank you, that's the one thing I'd expect to be a screenshot in a github repo. Regardless, I don't find it particularly legible. The taller aspect ratio with narrow letter gap actually is not super readable to me?

Maybe It's "more readable" for plane screen fonts than the other alternatives. It's not fair looking at a font on a 49" highdef ultrawide and saying "This isn't as good".

replies(4): >>45117051 #>>45118358 #>>45119856 #>>45129034 #
1. kergonath ◴[] No.45117051[source]
> Thank you, that's the one thing I'd expect to be a screenshot in a github repo.

Indeed. That’s clearly missing from the readme.

> Maybe It's "more readable" for plane screen fonts than the other alternatives. It's not fair looking at a font on a 49" highdef ultrawide and saying "This isn't as good".

Yeah. Their benchmark was suboptimal conditions in an aircraft cockpit. I would assume that they tested drastically different lighting conditions and exotic factors (for a font designed for computers) such as motion, vibration, and crew exhaustion.