←back to thread

Supreme Court's ruling practically wipes out free speech for sex writing online

(ellsberg.substack.com)
693 points macawfish | 2 comments | 12 Jul 25 18:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.42s | source
Show context
stego-tech ◴[12 Jul 25 22:01 UTC] No.44545563[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(13): >>44545616 #>>44545682 #>>44545696 #>>44545710 #>>44545757 #>>44545790 #>>44545791 #>>44545797 #>>44545819 #>>44545845 #>>44545912 #>>44546077 #>>44546515 #
frogperson ◴[12 Jul 25 22:39 UTC] No.44545791[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(3): >>44545973 #>>44545998 #>>44546074 #
NikolaNovak ◴[12 Jul 25 23:06 UTC] No.44545973[source]▶
Thank you for that, I've been looking for a decent pre-AI/Non-wikipedia summary like that. Unsurprisingly but depressingly, at least 13 out of 14 points are a perfect match.
replies(1): >>44547079 #
1. yoyohello13 ◴[13 Jul 25 02:44 UTC] No.44547079[source]▶
Well, jury is still out on #14…
replies(1): >>44547677 #
2. mystraline ◴[13 Jul 25 05:04 UTC] No.44547677[source]▶
Gerry and Mander told me to say hi.

(Seriously, gerrymandering, redistricting weaponization, bribery/campaign contributions, and the like are all forms of election corruption.)