(ellsberg.substack.com)

693 points macawfish | 3 comments | 12 Jul 25 18:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.793s | source

Show context

stego-tech ◴[12 Jul 25 22:01 UTC] No.44545563[source]▶

[flagged]

replies(13): >>44545616 #>>44545682 #>>44545696 #>>44545710 #>>44545757 #>>44545790 #>>44545791 #>>44545797 #>>44545819 #>>44545845 #>>44545912 #>>44546077 #>>44546515 #

frogperson ◴[12 Jul 25 22:39 UTC] No.44545791[source]▶

>>44545563 #

[flagged]

replies(3): >>44545973 #>>44545998 #>>44546074 #

1. NikolaNovak ◴[12 Jul 25 23:06 UTC] No.44545973[source]▶

>>44545791 #

Thank you for that, I've been looking for a decent pre-AI/Non-wikipedia summary like that. Unsurprisingly but depressingly, at least 13 out of 14 points are a perfect match.

replies(1): >>44547079 #

2. yoyohello13 ◴[13 Jul 25 02:44 UTC] No.44547079[source]▶

>>44545973 (TP) #

Well, jury is still out on #14…

replies(1): >>44547677 #

3. mystraline ◴[13 Jul 25 05:04 UTC] No.44547677[source]▶

>>44547079 #

Gerry and Mander told me to say hi.

(Seriously, gerrymandering, redistricting weaponization, bribery/campaign contributions, and the like are all forms of election corruption.)

↑

Supreme Court's ruling practically wipes out free speech for sex writing online