←back to thread

1036 points deryilz | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.593s | source
Show context
labrador ◴[] No.44544639[source]
I'd gladly pay for YouTube without ads if I trusted that it would remain ad free, but the track record from various companies on this is not good.
replies(11): >>44544646 #>>44544655 #>>44544660 #>>44544691 #>>44544696 #>>44544706 #>>44544736 #>>44544799 #>>44545011 #>>44545106 #>>44545121 #
matheusmoreira ◴[] No.44544706[source]
Paying to avoid ads just makes your attention even more valuable to them. Always block them unconditionally and without any payment.

Ads are a violation of the sanctity of our minds. They are not entitled to our attention. It's not currency to pay for services with.

replies(5): >>44544753 #>>44544829 #>>44545610 #>>44545702 #>>44548453 #
ThunderSizzle ◴[] No.44545702[source]
Or rather, don't use YouTube without paying.

Youtube isn't free, and unlike a simple blog, requires tons of infrastructure and content creation. None of that is free, and people wanting that to be free is why we're in adscape hell.

Edit: I'd love for a competitor to youtube, but there isn't. Rumble isn't a real competitor, and none of my favorite channels place their content there either.

I wish there was a youtube alternative that was more of a federation, but every attempt I've seen of federations have been mess.

replies(1): >>44546205 #
1. matheusmoreira ◴[] No.44546205[source]
> Youtube isn't free

Then charge for it like the other streaming services. If they send me ads, I'll block and delete them, manually or automatically, and I won't lose a second of sleep over it.

> requires tons of infrastructure and content creation

Not our problem. It's up to the so called innovators to come up with a working business model. If they can't, they should go bankrupt.

replies(1): >>44546834 #
2. ◴[] No.44546834[source]