←back to thread

480 points riffraff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
dang ◴[] No.44463006[source]
[stub for offtopicness]
replies(15): >>44461279 #>>44461280 #>>44461309 #>>44461334 #>>44461385 #>>44461408 #>>44461448 #>>44461634 #>>44461664 #>>44461731 #>>44461790 #>>44462060 #>>44462362 #>>44462565 #>>44462687 #
saubeidl ◴[] No.44462362[source]
In related news:

* Data centers powering artificial intelligence could use more electricity than entire cities [0]

* Google’s emissions up 51% as AI electricity demand derails efforts to go green [1]

* AI is poised to drive 160% increase in data center power demand [2]

It is a doomsday cult in the most literal sense.

[0] https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/23/data-centers-powering-ai-cou...

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/27/google-em...

[2] https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/AI-poised-to-...

replies(11): >>44462429 #>>44462451 #>>44462452 #>>44462511 #>>44462554 #>>44462564 #>>44462814 #>>44462819 #>>44462877 #>>44462879 #>>44463041 #
throwpoaster ◴[] No.44462554[source]
Electrical consumption does not emit greenhouse gasses.

Electrical production can emit greenhouse gasses, and there is an argument we should be inventing and investing in decarbonizing it.

replies(4): >>44462561 #>>44462660 #>>44462661 #>>44463011 #
1. imhoguy ◴[] No.44463011[source]
Decarbonization is a wet dream. Alternative energy sources require toxic minerals extraction and manufacturing which turns biosystems into dead wastelands and waterlands into dry dustlands.

The only way is to lower consumption drastically, end the constant growth chase, and enbrance closed carbon cycle (biodiverse biomass).