←back to thread

94 points mikece | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
ceejayoz ◴[] No.44397838[source]
So how broad is this?

Can a state now require you to verify your age and identity to read a newspaper they don't like?

replies(3): >>44397882 #>>44397903 #>>44397939 #
giarc ◴[] No.44397939[source]
Not unless that newspaper is "more than one-third sexual material".
replies(9): >>44397951 #>>44397995 #>>44398006 #>>44398008 #>>44398035 #>>44398053 #>>44398103 #>>44398383 #>>44399422 #
AshamedCaptain ◴[] No.44397995[source]
Wanna bet what the ratio is for e.g. Reddit?
replies(2): >>44398054 #>>44400196 #
1. ezekg ◴[] No.44398054[source]
NSFW is hidden by default iirc, so something like this would only apply to enabling NSFW content.