←back to thread

US Supreme Court Upholds Texas Porn ID Law

(www.wired.com)
94 points mikece | 3 comments | 27 Jun 25 15:55 UTC | HN request time: 0.611s | source
Show context
ceejayoz ◴[27 Jun 25 16:01 UTC] No.44397838[source]▶
So how broad is this?

Can a state now require you to verify your age and identity to read a newspaper they don't like?

replies(3): >>44397882 #>>44397903 #>>44397939 #
giarc ◴[27 Jun 25 16:10 UTC] No.44397939[source]▶
Not unless that newspaper is "more than one-third sexual material".
replies(9): >>44397951 #>>44397995 #>>44398006 #>>44398008 #>>44398035 #>>44398053 #>>44398103 #>>44398383 #>>44399422 #
1. AshamedCaptain ◴[27 Jun 25 16:16 UTC] No.44397995[source]▶
Wanna bet what the ratio is for e.g. Reddit?
replies(2): >>44398054 #>>44400196 #
2. ezekg ◴[27 Jun 25 16:22 UTC] No.44398054[source]▶
NSFW is hidden by default iirc, so something like this would only apply to enabling NSFW content.
3. ndriscoll ◴[27 Jun 25 21:01 UTC] No.44400196[source]▶
A couple years back (around when they were adding the API restrictions/shutting down third party apps), I found a site dump that looked like it was around 50%.