←back to thread

Gemini CLI

(blog.google)
1348 points sync | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
iandanforth ◴[] No.44377207[source]
I love how fragmented Google's Gemini offerings are. I'm a Pro subscriber, but I now learn I should be a "Gemini Code Assist Standard or Enterprise" user to get additional usage. I didn't even know that existed! As a run of the mill Google user I get a generous usage tier but paying them specifically for "Gemini" doesn't get me anything when it comes to "Gemini CLI". Delightful!
replies(21): >>44377223 #>>44377234 #>>44377268 #>>44377361 #>>44377524 #>>44377663 #>>44377759 #>>44377818 #>>44378537 #>>44378591 #>>44378915 #>>44379216 #>>44380359 #>>44382462 #>>44383491 #>>44384124 #>>44384673 #>>44384735 #>>44385178 #>>44385385 #>>44386691 #
GardenLetter27 ◴[] No.44377759[source]
Google is fumbling the bag so badly with the pricing.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the best model I've used (even better than o3 IMO) and yet there's no simple Claude/Cursor like subscription to just get full access.

Nevermind Enterprise users too, where OpenAI has it locked up.

replies(5): >>44378076 #>>44378228 #>>44379326 #>>44380318 #>>44385647 #
Xmd5a ◴[] No.44380318[source]
>Gemini 2.5 Pro is the best model

It's the second time I read this in this thread. May I ask why you think this is the case? And in which domains? I am very satisfied with 2.5 pro when it comes to philosophical/literary analysis, probably because of the super long context I can fill with whole books, and wanted to try Claude Code for the same purpose, but with folders, summaries, etc to make up for the shorter context length.

replies(2): >>44380819 #>>44385646 #
1. Davidzheng ◴[] No.44385646[source]
I think it's at least equal best at research math.