←back to thread

401 points Bluestein | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.41s | source
Show context
blakeashleyjr ◴[] No.44360605[source]
Dreams:

>Framework-like upgradability / repairability / modularity

>Support for GrapheneOS

>Sold in USA

replies(2): >>44361352 #>>44361789 #
bramhaag ◴[] No.44361352[source]
GrapheneOS support for Fairphone is unlikely to ever happen. Their hardware is too insecure to satisfy GOS's reasonable requirements [1] and have stated that they aren't interested in improving it [2]. Software is also lacking and they've partnered with Murena [3], who has been slinging shit at GOS [4].

On a more positive note, due to the AOSP/Pixel drama there now is a real possibility a different major OEM will be supported: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114711328082841462

[1] https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

[2] https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114733211017800480

[3] https://murena.com/

[4] https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114235396540176085

replies(4): >>44361856 #>>44362692 #>>44362712 #>>44364210 #
TheCraiggers ◴[] No.44362712[source]
That's excellent news that they're partnering with an OEM to make something. Here's hoping it's someone like Framework that has sustainability in mind as well.
replies(1): >>44363013 #
1. noisy_boy ◴[] No.44363013[source]
Why not Framework themselves? By now, they have brand recognition to certain extent and a ready customer base - I think a Framework phone with choices of GrapheneOS or LineageOS or standard Googleized option could be a very compelling product.

That is if they can sort out their availability gaps.

replies(1): >>44363149 #
2. UnreachableCode ◴[] No.44363149[source]
Massive cost.