←back to thread

713 points greenburger | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.24s | source
Show context
robertlagrant ◴[] No.44289775[source]
> When Facebook bought WhatsApp for $19 billion in 2014, the messaging app had a clear focus. No ads, no games and no gimmicks.

This sort of analysis is very surface-level I think. My impression is WhatsApp offered that by running on VC money and had no plan to run an actual business. That's not a question of focus. It's an unsustainable, please monetise me later land grab.

replies(6): >>44290094 #>>44291027 #>>44291284 #>>44293021 #>>44293894 #>>44294042 #
BiggerChungus ◴[] No.44291284[source]
Respectfully, clearly you aren't familiar with Jan and Brian's history of public statements.

Even for years after they were acquired by Meta, Jan refused to allow advertising and kept pushing the $1 dollar per user subscription fee. Sheryl nixed it b/c it was "not scalable."

VC's may have the mindset that the founders will eventually acquiesce to ads, but also they didn't really care b/c all they wanted was an exit, which they got.

The founders, however, were never interested in an ad business and hold that POV to this day.

replies(3): >>44291364 #>>44295347 #>>44295774 #
1. eviks ◴[] No.44295347[source]
> VC's may have the mindset that the founders will eventually acquiesce to ads > history of public statements.

Actions speak louder. He did acquiesce - he sold to an ad-financed company.

> and hold that POV to this day.

You can hold any POV when nothing depends on it.