/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
Changes since congestion pricing started in New York
(www.nytimes.com)
437 points
Vinnl
| 2 comments |
13 May 25 10:43 UTC
|
HN request time: 0s
|
source
Show context
philipallstar
◴[
14 May 25 14:36 UTC
]
No.
43985073
[source]
▶
>>43971515 (OP)
#
The increased speeds are excellent for those who can afford the toll. This is a universal benefit of toll roads for those people.
replies(11):
>>43985179
#
>>43985221
#
>>43985275
#
>>43985330
#
>>43985416
#
>>43985492
#
>>43985546
#
>>43990037
#
>>43990827
#
>>43991040
#
>>43994900
#
bryanlarsen
◴[
14 May 25 14:45 UTC
]
No.
43985179
[source]
▶
>>43985073
#
And the investments in public transit and bike paths are excellent for those who can't. Such unalloyed win-wins are hard to find.
replies(4):
>>43985193
#
>>43985280
#
>>43992158
#
>>43993536
#
lokar
◴[
14 May 25 14:47 UTC
]
No.
43985193
[source]
▶
>>43985179
#
I lived in Manhattan, and was very well paid. I did not own a car, and loved it. This would have been great for me as well.
replies(1):
>>43989879
#
timewizard
◴[
14 May 25 22:33 UTC
]
No.
43989879
[source]
▶
>>43985193
#
Did you have children or did you live alone?
replies(7):
>>43989923
#
>>43990006
#
>>43990154
#
>>43990171
#
>>43990543
#
>>43991841
#
>>43994594
#
donohoe
◴[
14 May 25 23:12 UTC
]
No.
43990154
[source]
▶
>>43989879
#
I live in Brooklyn with kids and do not have a car. Equally possible in Manhattan - have car-less friends with kids there too.
Just saying it is possible, and certainly not everyone’s choice.
replies(1):
>>43990742
#
vb234
◴[
15 May 25 00:51 UTC
]
No.
43990742
[source]
▶
>>43990154
#
Same. We live in Manhattan with two kids and owning a car is just an added expense without much benefit. To be fair, if you lived further out in Brooklyn (Bayridge, Sussex Beach and Coney Island) you probably need a car for the day to day.
replies(2):
>>43990980
#
>>43991205
#
1.
whoodle
◴[
15 May 25 02:15 UTC
]
No.
43991205
[source]
▶
>>43990742
#
Any rough guess the min income to raise a kid in manhattan nowadays?
replies(1):
>>43992195
#
ID:
GO
2.
baq
◴[
15 May 25 05:47 UTC
]
No.
43992195
[source]
▶
>>43991205 (TP)
#
More
↑