Most active commenters
  • sebstefan(4)

←back to thread

560 points amanchanda | 15 comments | | HN request time: 0.735s | source | bottom

I am building a B2C AI SaaS with $50/month price. How would you go about getting with first 100 users and then the next 500 users.

What we are currently doing: 1) Cold outreach to power users - to convert them into affiliates. 2) Cold outreach to individuals who have target ICP communities. 3) SEO for more long term (not for the first 500)

Show context
vanschelven ◴[] No.43971130[source]
Grown way past 100 users with:

• Make a great product. Everyone tells you "build it and they will come" is not working anymore, but it's working _for me_.

• Outreach via your network. Talk to people with the intent of learning, not selling.

• I'm personally on a freemium model. But that's in the developer-to-developer market, which is vastly different from your B2C

EDIT:

https://www.bugsink.com/ link to product, may give an idea of what we're doing.

replies(8): >>43971215 #>>43971237 #>>43971370 #>>43971490 #>>43971758 #>>43971779 #>>43979411 #>>43988581 #
1. sebstefan ◴[] No.43971758[source]
> https://www.bugsink.com/ link to product, may give an idea of what we're doing.

It's immediately obvious to me that the illustrations are AI slop

You should invest 20 bucks into getting some pictures of a guy in a datacenter, or 200 to pay some dude on Fiverr to draw you some sinks, instead of having these be the first thing customers see when checking out your product

replies(6): >>43971799 #>>43972175 #>>43972398 #>>43972529 #>>43972648 #>>43973840 #
2. MobileVet ◴[] No.43971799[source]
> It's immediately obvious to me that the illustrations are AI slop

I don't believe this qualifies as AI Slop. They are all consistent in their style and thus 'on brand' for what they are trying to convey. While visuals are fairly subjective and these may not speak to you, they don't have 'obvious slop characteristics' eg 6 fingers or 3 eyes imho.

replies(1): >>43971912 #
3. sebstefan ◴[] No.43971912[source]
If you can tell immediately that an illustration is AI-made, for me it already qualifies as slop. It gives low quality, lack of effort, "Is this website legit or is this some guy running a scam from their bedroom in Malaysia" type vibe
4. bwb ◴[] No.43972175[source]
wow I didn't see it that way at all, they looked good to me.
replies(1): >>43972300 #
5. wahnfrieden ◴[] No.43972300[source]
They are very obviously "AI generated genre" which many still don't pick up on. Whether art that is obviously AI-generated is appealing or effective - that may also be the case
replies(1): >>43972448 #
6. theshrike79 ◴[] No.43972398[source]
Still a tiny bit better than the "massive limbs bendy people" corporate style.
replies(1): >>43972610 #
7. bwb ◴[] No.43972448{3}[source]
shrug, i don't mind, looks good
8. stevoski ◴[] No.43972529[source]
I'd wager that paying customers really don't care whether the images look AI-generated or not.

They care much more about whether this product solves a problem they have.

This is based on my 17 years of running first a successful B2C product then a successful B2B SaaS.

Minor changes to one's home page tend to have little observable change in numbers of trial signups, the rate of conversion to paid customer, and so on.

replies(1): >>43975351 #
9. sebstefan ◴[] No.43972610[source]
It's called Corporate Memphis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Memphis)

Might be soulless and ugly too, but at least it doesn't make your customer think "Hold on is this a scam?"

replies(2): >>43977585 #>>43979598 #
10. conductr ◴[] No.43972648[source]
I also think those images are not super aesthetically pleasing but I also don’t care about the sink metaphor they’re using so I instantly ignore them and just focus on the text
11. delfinom ◴[] No.43973840[source]
Are you upset by the kitchen sink metaphor? lmao
replies(1): >>43974501 #
12. sebstefan ◴[] No.43974501[source]
?
13. drysart ◴[] No.43975351[source]
> I'd wager that paying customers really don't care whether the images look AI-generated or not.

Maybe, but in a conversation about acquiring your first hundred users; you don't have a lot of word-of-mouth backing up the quality of your product. Your ability to effectively present your product will never be more important.

If it's important enough that your brochure website has images on it at all, then it's also important enough for them to not look like something you'd see slapped on a scam.

14. MajorLettuce ◴[] No.43977585{3}[source]
It’s actually quite interesting how both styles can be considered slop, but Corporate Memphis evokes different association. It makes me think that style did something right.
15. vimy ◴[] No.43979598{3}[source]
I’m not sure seeing AI art and thinking scam is a thing. Most people can’t even spot AI art.

His website seems fine to me.