Most active commenters
  • ekianjo(5)
  • mensetmanusman(4)
  • ben_w(3)
  • CGMthrowaway(3)

←back to thread

606 points saikatsg | 58 comments | | HN request time: 0.306s | source | bottom
1. mensetmanusman ◴[] No.43931060[source]
“ That the spirit of revolutionary change, which has long been disturbing the nations of the world, should have passed beyond the sphere of politics and made its influence felt in the cognate sphere of practical economics is not surprising.

The elements of the conflict now raging are unmistakable, in the vast expansion of industrial pursuits and the marvelous discoveries of science; in the changed relations between masters and workmen; in the enormous fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the masses; the increased self reliance and closer mutual combination of the working classes; as also, finally, in the prevailing moral degeneracy. The momentous gravity of the state of things now obtaining fills every mind with painful apprehension; wise men are discussing it; practical men are proposing schemes; popular meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all busied with it - actually there is no question which has taken deeper hold on the public mind.”

From the last Pope Leo over 100 years ago.

replies(3): >>43931099 #>>43931231 #>>43932596 #
2. actionfromafar ◴[] No.43931099[source]
That definitely rhymes, more than rhymes actually.
3. Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe ◴[] No.43931231[source]
Neat thanks.

Btw how do you know this?! Have you memorized stuff of all the passed popes?

replies(5): >>43931293 #>>43931346 #>>43931522 #>>43931840 #>>43935147 #
4. mensetmanusman ◴[] No.43931293[source]
These are the types of things talked about in small groups near your local cathedral by members of groups like Opus Dei everywhere around the world. All are welcome :)
replies(3): >>43931803 #>>43932974 #>>43935050 #
5. kergonath ◴[] No.43931346[source]
The last Leo was a notable pope. His views are well known. You don’t need to memorise everything, a lot of what they’ve said over the years is available in books or online.
replies(1): >>43931452 #
6. ben_w ◴[] No.43931452{3}[source]
Pope Quartz: https://xkcd.com/2501/

I was raised Catholic and couldn't have even told you there'd been a single Pope Leo, let alone 13 of them before today. The only Pope quote I could even give you is the term "Ex Cathedra".

replies(2): >>43931778 #>>43933775 #
7. Archelaos ◴[] No.43931522[source]
This is the beginning of perhaps the most famous of Leo XIII.'s many encyclicals, entitled "Rerum novarum" from 1891. To my knowledge it is the first of many papal encyclicals on social issues. It thus marks an important point in church history (and beyond that in the history of ideas in general).

For further details see the encyclical's Wikipedia entry at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rerum_Novarum

For the text itself: https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/docum...

replies(1): >>43933987 #
8. PortiaBerries ◴[] No.43931778{4}[source]
It never ceases to amaze me how poorly catechized the majority of cradle Catholics are. I don't intend this to be directed at you, but it's a standing joke among traditionalist Catholics that "I was raised Catholic" is the preamble to a statement of either ignorance or heresy.
replies(10): >>43931952 #>>43931983 #>>43932256 #>>43932443 #>>43932603 #>>43932968 #>>43933674 #>>43933714 #>>43934123 #>>43934681 #
9. dragonwriter ◴[] No.43931803{3}[source]
I don't think Opus Dei spends a lot of time discussing Rerum Novarum, honestly.
replies(2): >>43932237 #>>43933070 #
10. Sharlin ◴[] No.43931840[source]
There are already a plenty of analysis pieces published by reputable news sources that discuss the new pope's chosen regal name and its significance, in particular in relation to the last Leo and his views and important writings.
11. ben_w ◴[] No.43931983{5}[source]
> I don't intend this to be directed at you, but it's a standing joke among traditionalist Catholics that "I was raised Catholic" is the preamble to a statement of either ignorance or heresy.

It's cool, no offence taken.

My mother took it all very seriously, but she was also syncretic New Age/Hindu/Catholic; she got me baptised at birth and took the lead with Sunday school and going to Church etc, my dad was mainly interested in getting me into a good school that was Catholic but himself was atheist.

I actually read the entire New Testament while at school, took it at face value, thought "this doesn't work, does it?" and went to Wicca for a bit before deciding that wasn't for me either.

I think at no point did anyone bother to explain the structure of the Catholic church, they just kinda assumed we all knew it, when what we knew was from pop culture. I think your local priest was unavoidable knowledge, but pop culture gave me bishops, the Pope (but not the fact that his official title isn't that until it came up on the quiz show QI), and the obvious joke about Cardinal Jaime Sin. The actual education gave me no sense of ranks or the organisation or how nuns and monks fit in — just the same five bible tales (birth, walking on water, feeding of 5000, eye of the needle, death and resurrection) over and over again. With singing.

The pattern you've noticed, I think also applies to the UK citizenship test: there's a general sense that most people born with UK nationality wouldn't be able to pass the test to become a citizen as an adult.

replies(1): >>43932133 #
12. brianwawok ◴[] No.43932133{6}[source]
Growing up Catholic we learned all that stuff at CCD which was a Wednesday night “Sunday school”. Otherwise no idea how you would pick it up without google.
replies(1): >>43935135 #
13. CGMthrowaway ◴[] No.43932237{4}[source]
What do they discuss? There is an Opus Dei church near me and I always wondered what was up
replies(2): >>43934615 #>>43936941 #
14. CGMthrowaway ◴[] No.43932256{5}[source]
For most of history 99% of Catholics could not read, much less own a Bible. The fetishization of theology is not necessary to be a good Catholic
replies(3): >>43932412 #>>43934187 #>>43934663 #
15. TheFreim ◴[] No.43932412{6}[source]
Literacy is a great gift which shouldn't be squandered: much will be required of the person entrusted with much, and still more will be demanded of the person entrusted with more. To try to make knowledge of ones spiritual heritage out to be "fetishization" is inappropriate in my estimation. This reminds me of a story told by Dr. Scott Hahn, a Catholic biblical scholar, about an experience he once had (closely paraphrased):

Questioner: "Why do we need to know all of this [bible study, theology, etc]? I can just think of the medieval peasant who is illiterate and thus disqualified from any and everything that you're talking about."

Dr. Hahn: "I think the best response to your question would actually come from the medieval peasant himself, because if you could imagine him standing here next to me he would look at you and say, 'You're using me as an excuse? You have books, you have literacy, you have access to these resources, and you're using me as an excuse to not take advantage of them?'"

16. jwmcq ◴[] No.43932443{5}[source]
Growing up to Scottish and Irish Catholics in England, I remember talking to a bunch of Ulster protestants as a teenager when the topic turned to religion - I said "Well, I was raised Catholic but I'm not really a believer of any kind" and the response was "Ah, so you're one of THOSE Catholics!".

Turns out there are a lot of 'those' Catholics.

replies(1): >>43932682 #
17. FrustratedMonky ◴[] No.43932596[source]
"From the last Pope Leo over 100 years ago."

everything old is new again.

history repeats.

we never learn.

The Terminator: "It's in your nature to destroy yourselves"

18. im3w1l ◴[] No.43932603{5}[source]
I was raised atheist and the education I received on religion was also firmly from an atheist (I guess anthropological?) viewpoint. What we were taught was that religion in theory (e.g. what is written in the holy books) and religion as it's actually practiced can often be quite different and none of them is realer than the other. Or something like that, it was a while ago.
19. B1FF_PSUVM ◴[] No.43932682{6}[source]
Don't go to church, but know which church they are not going to.
20. cperciva ◴[] No.43932968{5}[source]
Isn't that the point though? To provide a disjunction?

"I was raised Catholic" is like "I'm not racist but".

21. cperciva ◴[] No.43932974{3}[source]
All are welcome

Including atheists?

replies(3): >>43933224 #>>43933926 #>>43936681 #
22. tclancy ◴[] No.43933070{4}[source]
I dunno, they spent a ton of time talking about how to get rid of the last pope, so who knows which other "Actually believe the teachings of Christ" popes they bad-mouth when they get together?
23. bb86754 ◴[] No.43933224{4}[source]
Yup
24. TMWNN ◴[] No.43933674{5}[source]
>It never ceases to amaze me how poorly catechized the majority of cradle Catholics are.

The classic example being asking one "What is the immaculate conception?"

That said, I have no reason to think that the average Catholic is more or less knowledgeable about his religion than any other Christian.

replies(1): >>43933875 #
25. ekianjo ◴[] No.43933714{5}[source]
Who the pope is, is not really relevant. It's not like the pope will suddenly go against the key scriptures or something.

Also, most Catholics are born in catholic families so it's not like they chose catholicism over something else.

replies(2): >>43934693 #>>43935029 #
26. asielen ◴[] No.43933775{4}[source]
I would generally agree, except that there is a very well know Pope Leo that anyone who has taken any European history should know about. Pope Leo X that was Pope when Martin Luther kicked off the reformation.
27. kens ◴[] No.43933875{6}[source]
What most people get wrong is that the immaculate conception is the conception of Mary, not Jesus, and is completely different from virgin birth.
28. hokumguru ◴[] No.43933926{4}[source]
Especially atheists
29. Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe ◴[] No.43933987{3}[source]
Thanks a lot!
30. remarkEon ◴[] No.43934123{5}[source]
No idea how old OP is, but I think there's a pattern amongst Millennial cradle Catholics in particular. You grow up with it, maybe you went to Catholic grade school and high school, perhaps even a Catholic college (Notre Dame if you're lucky, Creighton or Marquette if you didn't get that 1500 on the SAT or a 34 on the ACT that you wanted). And then there's sort of a fork when you hit adulthood. You either drop it and never come back, or you passively drift away and then one day you get married and have kids and start taking it seriously again. I knew the reference because of the latter. I suspect there's a lot of Millennial Catholics who are like that.

This is to say, or rather explain, that I respect those who convert and have a predilection to Traditionalism. Part of the reason cradle Catholics drifted away is that the boomer generation basically ruined the mystique and the tradition, so when you're a kid it just felt like another chore.

replies(1): >>43934174 #
31. User23 ◴[] No.43934174{6}[source]
The OP AKA Dominicans date back to 1216.

Haha obviously I’m kidding you but that’s truly tangentially relevant

32. User23 ◴[] No.43934187{6}[source]
For most of history even a single book of the Bible would cost a princely sum.

Even today a single manuscript vellum scroll is a significant expense.

33. _a3ax ◴[] No.43934615{5}[source]
Opus Dei is an extreme reactionary group within the church. Leo XIII was a liberal pope responsible for the social doctrine of the church (this text).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_about_Opus_Dei

Personal experience: when I was in high school in my country there was a teacher who was in Opus Dei. He tried to recruit students by leaving them a letter and inviting them to a "scholarship". I got such a letter, I was so excited. The school found out about that and investigated. We're a mixed-race country. The Opus Dei teacher has invited exclusively white students. He had invited top students #2 to #4 in my class by grade, but not #1, who was black.

replies(2): >>43935468 #>>43935786 #
34. graemep ◴[] No.43934663{6}[source]
Bibles were the first book to sell in large numbers when the printing press was invented.

Before that the church did expect at least priests and monks and nuns to be able to read the Bible, and there were a lot of them.

Most is strictly true, but you are talking about a millennium between the clear primacy of Rome and the invention of the printing press, and half a millennium since so its not hugely more.

Finally, historically most people could not own books and had no to limited literacy. Literacy is not necessary to be a good anything, but its definitely better to be literate and have access to things to read.

replies(1): >>43966577 #
35. ◴[] No.43934681{5}[source]
36. graemep ◴[] No.43934693{6}[source]
> Also, most Catholics are born in catholic families so it's not like they chose catholicism over something else.

I do not know whether that is true any more, at least in all countries. At one Catholic parish I knew in Britain about half the congregation were adult converts.

Then there are a lot of people who leave and return. I might count as that - Catholic family, was agnostic (and married in registry office, which turned out to be useful), and now am definitely a Christian but feel denomination does not matter and do not really accept much of the Catholic theology (and some of its practical consequences, such as no women priests really bother me). OTOH I have not, and would not, formally leave the church either.

37. ZoomZoomZoom ◴[] No.43935029{6}[source]
Who the president is, is not really relevant. It's not like the president will suddenly go against the constitution or something.

Bring serious, it's kind of important due to the Pope's infallibility.

replies(1): >>43935444 #
38. toofy ◴[] No.43935050{3}[source]
while it wouldn’t surprise me to learn they might be discussing this, but if they were it would almost certainly be in disgust—opus dei is very very extreme in their dislike of ideas such as those from pope leo.

one of my grandparents dabbled, and every single one of them i’ve met were very… trying to be kind here… veerrry very into the church. not a normal into the church, much more extreme. i’m desperately trying not to use the c word, but it really does fit. if one finds themselves being taken in, truly, please, take just a lil bit and learn how orgs like scientology and heavens gate etc… recruit people. the recruitment similarities are uncanny. the after effects are uncanny.

39. pbh101 ◴[] No.43935135{7}[source]
Or Catholic primary/secondary education.

But still, both are highly variable in quality/coverage and likely much less consistent than you might assume if unfamiliar with the space.

40. ccppurcell ◴[] No.43935147[source]
Someone asked me the same question! I just know that popes pick their names to indicate what their priorities are. Francis picked a totally new name. I think that in itself signals a time of change in the church, we can also look to st Francis And the traditional association with kindness, mercy, not to mention his "Rule" (basically that Christ had no possessions).

Typically the previous pope with that name is where you look. Maybe the first too. Leo I stood up to Atilla the Hun. Leo XIII championed trade unions and workers rights (though also rejected socialism). Make of it what you will.

41. ekianjo ◴[] No.43935444{7}[source]
Irrelevant analogy. You can't change country super easily but you can stop being a Catholic in 5 seconds if you decide it.
replies(2): >>43936840 #>>43937540 #
42. mensetmanusman ◴[] No.43935468{6}[source]
Meanwhile I mostly interacted with Opus Dei members near Harvard that were Nigerian, Spanish, and Mexican.
replies(2): >>43935534 #>>43966434 #
43. zorked ◴[] No.43935534{7}[source]
Each country has their own racial hierarchy that may not, and usually does not, match yours.
replies(1): >>43939374 #
44. 4ggr0 ◴[] No.43935786{6}[source]
> We're a mixed-race country

There are single-race countries?

replies(1): >>43937433 #
45. mystified5016 ◴[] No.43936681{4}[source]
As long as you aren't a smug asshole about it, most religious people don't mind talking about religion with atheists. You have to be honestly interested in what they have to say and not just looking for a way to 'prove them wrong'
replies(1): >>43945312 #
46. bevesce- ◴[] No.43936840{8}[source]
Apostasy is not that quick or easy. Depending on a country the church can fight you on that.
replies(1): >>43942681 #
47. lambdaphagy ◴[] No.43936941{5}[source]
When I visited an Opus Dei house once for a philosophy lecture they were discussing Plato, the Timaeus in particular.
48. CGMthrowaway ◴[] No.43937433{7}[source]
Depending on how you count, Egypt, Morocco, Bangladesh, North Korea...
replies(1): >>43938596 #
49. disgruntledphd2 ◴[] No.43937540{8}[source]
> you can stop being a Catholic in 5 seconds if you decide it.

How does one officially leave the Catholic Church?

Sure, you can stop attending church and taking communion, but you're still on a list somewhere in your parish(es).

replies(1): >>43942678 #
50. 4ggr0 ◴[] No.43938596{8}[source]
i know what you mean, although they're not single-race (i hate using this expression, omg) in a binary way. or at least only if you exclude the minorities in these countries who still make it diverse, be it in a small way.
51. mensetmanusman ◴[] No.43939374{8}[source]
This was the US.
52. ekianjo ◴[] No.43942678{9}[source]
Being on a list means what? How does that impact your life?
replies(1): >>43944383 #
53. ekianjo ◴[] No.43942681{9}[source]
Any example?
54. ben_w ◴[] No.43944383{10}[source]
Some places have church tax based on your religion, such as Germany. I've heard varying claims from locals about the difficulty of leaving organised religion, though for me as an Auslander it was as easy as just saying "none" in the right box when setting up my tax ID.
replies(1): >>43946660 #
55. 90s_dev ◴[] No.43945312{5}[source]
Conversations with those kinds can be fun too, if you're in the right mood.
56. ekianjo ◴[] No.43946660{11}[source]
I am aware of Germany but that's an exception. In no other (developed) country are your taxes tied to your faith.
57. adl ◴[] No.43966434{7}[source]
Where they wealthy? That's the only thing the Opus Dei cares about.
58. AStonesThrow ◴[] No.43966577{7}[source]
A phenomenon that I see all too often is the absurdity of young adults who try to plow through writings of St. Thomas Aquinas and the Church Fathers, which is great, so when do they have time to read Scripture itself?

I think it's great that literacy and the printing press has democratized the reading of books, but when you're faced with such a corpus presented by Catholic tradition, you really need to pick and choose your weekly time investments!

I've inquired with a few religious orders as a layperson. The first thing you will find when inquiring with them is the thickness of tomes that land on the table for all adherents to read. Each religious order has a particular spirituality that is synthesized in the writings of saints and mystics. So if I was not already well-acquainted and well-grounded in the Old and New Testaments, and in the habit of reading those every day, what good would it do me to read Aquinas? Or Leo XIII encyclicals? Pointless.

The Bible itself has so many layers and aspects and messages for us. Many scholars invest entire lifetimes in understanding only the Bible. The only way to be a good Christian is to live the life. It doesn't matter what books you've read, at the end of the day, only your experience and your response to the Holy Spirit. If that means reading books, then good. If that means welding metal, also good. But, don't try to break open the words of Aquinas before you've read Daniel, or Matthew!