←back to thread

634 points RVRX | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
18172828286177 ◴[] No.43713766[source]
Godaddy is such an incompetent organisation. Should not be allowed to administer anything of importance.
replies(3): >>43714374 #>>43715750 #>>43720463 #
1. nom ◴[] No.43715750[source]
It's easy to blame GoDaddy, but 'miscommunication' takes two.

You pay Markmonitor a shitload of money to make sure this doesn't happen. They should have dedicated people at GoDaddy and direct communication channels.

This is a significant fuckup on Markmonitor's part, even if GoDaddy did something different than was requested from them.

replies(2): >>43717744 #>>43719015 #
2. Hobadee ◴[] No.43717744[source]
I can guarantee you that miscommunication doesn't always require 2 people.

Source: Have been OH SO EVER PRECISCE AND EXACT in my communication with certain idiots, and they still screw it up. Several instances of "put this here carefully", only to return and find it all the way across the room upside-down and broken, come to mind.

3. subscribed ◴[] No.43719015[source]
Mark Monitor have correctly asked for `serverUpdateProhibited`, GoDaddy changed the code to `serverHold` instead.

I don't know why you're trying to spin it as Mark Monitor fault.

replies(1): >>43726229 #
4. gavinsyancey ◴[] No.43726229[source]
Where are you getting that from? I don't see that info anywhere on the linked page. Is there more information published elsewhere, or do you have insider knowledge?