←back to thread

555 points maheshrijal | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.957s | source
Show context
planb ◴[] No.43707887[source]
What is wrong with OpenAI? The naming of their models seems like it is intentionally confusing - maybe to distract from lack of progress? Honestly, I have no idea which model to use for simply everyday tasks anymore.
replies(6): >>43707954 #>>43707970 #>>43707996 #>>43708010 #>>43708019 #>>43709904 #
sho_hn ◴[] No.43707954[source]
Seems to me like they're somewhat trying to simplify now.

GPT-N.m -> Non-reasoning

oN -> Reasoning

oN+1-mini -> Reasoning but speedy; cut-down version of an upcoming oN model (unclear if true or marketing)

It would be nice if they actually stick to this pattern.

replies(3): >>43708026 #>>43708083 #>>43709806 #
1. krackers ◴[] No.43709806[source]
But we have both 4o and 4.1 for non-reasoning. And it's still not clear to me which is better (the comparison on their page was from an older version of 4o).