←back to thread

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash

(petapixel.com)
553 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 1.413s | source
Show context
megaman821 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:14 UTC] No.43654757[source]▶
As a lurker on both Bluesky and Twitter, I find Bluesky is a much more hostile place. Twitter is much more absurd but there is not as much anger.
replies(25): >>43654879 #>>43654911 #>>43654964 #>>43654978 #>>43654981 #>>43655179 #>>43658062 #>>43658076 #>>43658200 #>>43658690 #>>43659029 #>>43659158 #>>43659250 #>>43659251 #>>43659639 #>>43659684 #>>43659724 #>>43659908 #>>43660101 #>>43660296 #>>43660933 #>>43661119 #>>43665491 #>>43667438 #>>43667522 #
jsight ◴[11 Apr 25 20:16 UTC] No.43658062[source]▶
Yeah, I'm surprised by how many here are responding with weird Adobe rants. They posted fairly innocuous stuff, were attacked, and ultimately chose to abandon the platform as a result.

This sounds like a bigger indictment of the platform than anything to do with Adobe.

replies(2): >>43659408 #>>43659936 #
TremendousJudge ◴[11 Apr 25 22:32 UTC] No.43659408[source]▶
Maybe the people on the platform don't want it to get filled by bland corporate accounts like twitter did
replies(2): >>43659663 #>>43659756 #
1. bakugo ◴[11 Apr 25 23:07 UTC] No.43659663[source]▶
Yes, they want it to be an echo chamber for one-sided political rants instead. Which is what it is now.