Most active commenters
  • yakkomajuri(4)

←back to thread

1525 points saeedesmaili | 11 comments | | HN request time: 0.815s | source | bottom
1. yakkomajuri ◴[] No.43653055[source]
I feel like this with my (current) bank of choice here in Brazil. They were one of the first to focus on being digital-first and allowed opening an account without going to a branch etc. They grew fast and became one of the largest banks in the country and generally considered pretty solid. I've been banking there for like a decade.

Now they've decided to be what they call a "SuperApp". This goddamn super app has a Twitter-like thing inside of it, shopping, and literally dozens of other products. Some core banking features are now hard to find but more importantly I had quite a few issues with investments as well. People who work there also tell me about messy problems on the financial services bits. It's very clear to me that in trying to become everything, they've deprioritized the fundamental products they offer, which are those related to banking. I want to store money, send and receive it, invest it, and have access to credit. But the experience of using those features has become significantly worse as new verticals sprouted up.

replies(4): >>43653116 #>>43655041 #>>43655522 #>>43659985 #
2. jgilias ◴[] No.43653116[source]
That’s because WeChat has really taken off in China. So there are companies in different markets trying to replicate that. And, well, from business perspective it does make sense. If you manage to pull it off, the reward is massive.
replies(1): >>43653153 #
3. yakkomajuri ◴[] No.43653153[source]
Yeah definitely. I'm not oblivious to the potential gain to the business. I'm just frustrated with the user experience of the core banking products. And it seems like this is the direction other banks might like to follow.
replies(1): >>43654126 #
4. jgilias ◴[] No.43654126{3}[source]
I feel you. Having a chat function is the last thing I want in my banking app lol.
5. hcarvalhoalves ◴[] No.43655041[source]
I believe the "Peter principle" [1] also holds for companies. A company grows until it eventually outlives its mission and loses focus.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle

replies(1): >>43655451 #
6. yakkomajuri ◴[] No.43655451[source]
Did a quick stalk based on your Brazilian name... I am talking about your competitor ofc!

I have an account with you guys too but haven't kept up with the developments at all. I do wonder what direction you're going in - particularly given the tech company valuation the US market has given ya.

(I don't expect you to reply to this)

7. rambambram ◴[] No.43655522[source]
I have the same with my banking app here in The Netherlands. I don't know if they try to be a super app, but since a year or two they put all kinds of annoying ads inside their app and unnecessary notifications on top of my account overview. Just show me the numbers, I pay for your service.
replies(1): >>43658700 #
8. crote ◴[] No.43658700[source]
It's the same with mobile payment. AFAIK there isn't a single bank left in The Netherlands which has its own mobile tap-to-pay app, everyone has switched to Google Wallet.

Good for them that they want to save a few bucks on developers, but why do I have to give my payment info to the devil? It's a third party which has nothing to do with the payment itself, and the fact that some banks used to have their own tap-to-pay apps shows that it clearly isn't a technical requirement.

9. alister ◴[] No.43659985[source]
> I feel like this with my (current) bank of choice here in Brazil. Now they've decided to be what they call a "SuperApp".

I'm curious to know the name of that digital bank.

replies(1): >>43660440 #
10. aianus ◴[] No.43660440[source]
Sounds like NuBank
replies(1): >>43680195 #
11. yakkomajuri ◴[] No.43680195{3}[source]
Well NuBank might have a similar trajectory I don't know but I'm talking about Banco Inter who explicitly talks about the term "SuperApp"