Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    666 points jcartw | 11 comments | | HN request time: 0.609s | source | bottom
    Show context
    bestouff ◴[] No.43620573[source]
    > Pix has spiced up Brazil’s fusty banking sector, but it gives the central bank a worrying amount of power

    I think a largely prefer a government-run payment system than an US company monopoly.

    replies(7): >>43620584 #>>43620865 #>>43620874 #>>43620906 #>>43620937 #>>43624958 #>>43625649 #
    1. nicce ◴[] No.43620584[source]
    Payment systems take huge fees. It is always good if they get back to the country and not elsewhere. Digital paying is something fundamental. Like electricity.
    replies(3): >>43620757 #>>43625714 #>>43629090 #
    2. augusto-moura ◴[] No.43620757[source]
    Brazilian Pix is free though, at least for the time being. IMO the biggest thing is not the money behind it, but the ability to track individual payments. Even that, I prefer the government to have that information, than some shady owner of a private company
    replies(1): >>43620802 #
    3. souenzzo ◴[] No.43620802[source]
    PIX are free for persons. Companies may* pay for pix services. My bank (that is not a good bank) charges a fixed amount of 4 BRL (aprox 1 USD) per transaction (to send PIX. not to receive) PIX in "maquininhas" may cost ~1% to the seller.

    * may: banks are allowed to charge.

    replies(3): >>43621139 #>>43622843 #>>43629345 #
    4. rpgbr ◴[] No.43621139{3}[source]
    Which is way cheaper than credit/debit card charges from Visa and Mastercard.
    replies(1): >>43622201 #
    5. marcosdumay ◴[] No.43622201{4}[source]
    And there's no surprise fraud claims.
    replies(1): >>43622854 #
    6. 8bitbeep ◴[] No.43622843{3}[source]
    > 4 BRL (aprox 1 USD)

    I wish. That's off by 50%

    7. xfalcox ◴[] No.43622854{5}[source]
    My wife runs a small retail makeup shop on Shopify, which started before pix and those surprise false fraud claims almost killed the business.

    Pix was such a game changer. It is perfect.

    8. xethos ◴[] No.43625714[source]
    Fast, free, and frictionless payments allow the economy to run better. That's better for the government and the people. Only corporations like Visa and Mastercard lose.
    9. blackoil ◴[] No.43629090[source]
    > Payment systems take huge fees

    That is the monopoly cost. UPI is free for both payee and payer. Whatever it costs banks to operate it is covered by reduced cost of dealing with cash/consumer.

    10. Voultapher ◴[] No.43629345{3}[source]
    To give some reference, using stripe you pay 2-3% for credit card payments and PayPal charges you ~5% of the transaction amount. Apple store and Steam take 30%. So honestly 1% sounds like a great deal.
    replies(1): >>43629870 #
    11. norman784 ◴[] No.43629870{4}[source]
    I think comparing Steam and to some extend Apple with payment methods, they are stores and it cost money to store apps and games and for this one I'm not 100% sure, but I read a while ago that they also pay taxes for you in the country you sell, while pure payment processing services are just a proxy to move money from one account to another. You could argue that 30% is high for that, but we aren't discussing it here.