←back to thread

666 points jcartw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
bestouff ◴[] No.43620573[source]
> Pix has spiced up Brazil’s fusty banking sector, but it gives the central bank a worrying amount of power

I think a largely prefer a government-run payment system than an US company monopoly.

replies(7): >>43620584 #>>43620865 #>>43620874 #>>43620906 #>>43620937 #>>43624958 #>>43625649 #
nicce ◴[] No.43620584[source]
Payment systems take huge fees. It is always good if they get back to the country and not elsewhere. Digital paying is something fundamental. Like electricity.
replies(3): >>43620757 #>>43625714 #>>43629090 #
augusto-moura ◴[] No.43620757[source]
Brazilian Pix is free though, at least for the time being. IMO the biggest thing is not the money behind it, but the ability to track individual payments. Even that, I prefer the government to have that information, than some shady owner of a private company
replies(1): >>43620802 #
souenzzo ◴[] No.43620802[source]
PIX are free for persons. Companies may* pay for pix services. My bank (that is not a good bank) charges a fixed amount of 4 BRL (aprox 1 USD) per transaction (to send PIX. not to receive) PIX in "maquininhas" may cost ~1% to the seller.

* may: banks are allowed to charge.

replies(3): >>43621139 #>>43622843 #>>43629345 #
1. 8bitbeep ◴[] No.43622843[source]
> 4 BRL (aprox 1 USD)

I wish. That's off by 50%