←back to thread

Brazil's government-run payments system has become dominant

(www.economist.com)
666 points jcartw | 3 comments | 08 Apr 25 10:59 UTC | HN request time: 1.852s | source
Show context
bestouff ◴[08 Apr 25 11:47 UTC] No.43620573[source]▶
> Pix has spiced up Brazil’s fusty banking sector, but it gives the central bank a worrying amount of power

I think a largely prefer a government-run payment system than an US company monopoly.

replies(7): >>43620584 #>>43620865 #>>43620874 #>>43620906 #>>43620937 #>>43624958 #>>43625649 #
nicce ◴[08 Apr 25 11:49 UTC] No.43620584[source]▶
Payment systems take huge fees. It is always good if they get back to the country and not elsewhere. Digital paying is something fundamental. Like electricity.
replies(3): >>43620757 #>>43625714 #>>43629090 #
augusto-moura ◴[08 Apr 25 12:09 UTC] No.43620757[source]▶
Brazilian Pix is free though, at least for the time being. IMO the biggest thing is not the money behind it, but the ability to track individual payments. Even that, I prefer the government to have that information, than some shady owner of a private company
replies(1): >>43620802 #
souenzzo ◴[08 Apr 25 12:16 UTC] No.43620802[source]▶
PIX are free for persons. Companies may* pay for pix services. My bank (that is not a good bank) charges a fixed amount of 4 BRL (aprox 1 USD) per transaction (to send PIX. not to receive) PIX in "maquininhas" may cost ~1% to the seller.

* may: banks are allowed to charge.

replies(3): >>43621139 #>>43622843 #>>43629345 #
1. rpgbr ◴[08 Apr 25 12:49 UTC] No.43621139[source]▶
Which is way cheaper than credit/debit card charges from Visa and Mastercard.
replies(1): >>43622201 #
2. marcosdumay ◴[08 Apr 25 14:28 UTC] No.43622201[source]▶
And there's no surprise fraud claims.
replies(1): >>43622854 #
3. xfalcox ◴[08 Apr 25 15:20 UTC] No.43622854[source]▶
My wife runs a small retail makeup shop on Shopify, which started before pix and those surprise false fraud claims almost killed the business.

Pix was such a game changer. It is perfect.