←back to thread

185 points psxuaw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nine_k ◴[] No.43536856[source]
If systemd is the reason, there are several good distros without systemd (I run Void Linux in particular).

If "kubesomething" is the reason, there's no requirement to use it. I think most people don't run it on their home servers.

If containers are the reason, then again, they are not a requirement. But they are pretty similar to BSD's jails. I don't think they are particularly complex.

FreeBSD has a number of strong suits: ZFS, a different kernel and network stack, a cohesive system from a small(ish) team of authors, the handbook, etc. But the usual Linux hobgoblins listed above are a red herring here, to my mind.

replies(5): >>43536992 #>>43541101 #>>43541384 #>>43541789 #>>43543787 #
m463 ◴[] No.43541101[source]
To me arch linux is the middle ground between a too-much-complexity "fat" distribution like ubuntu or debian and a-minimal-but-eclectic-freebsd.

the arch wiki is VERY comprehensive, linux has a huge community, and arch forced you to understand much just by stepping through the installation process.

replies(5): >>43541224 #>>43541387 #>>43546132 #>>43548551 #>>43549450 #
osn9363739 ◴[] No.43541224[source]
arch (or any rolling release) on a home server doesn't sound like a good idea?
replies(4): >>43541615 #>>43542599 #>>43542748 #>>43554429 #
packetlost ◴[] No.43541615[source]
if you actually run updates regularly (which you should anyways) it's fine. I did it for years until I switched to NixOS.
replies(1): >>43541713 #
twelvedogs ◴[] No.43541713[source]
yeah, this was my main annoyance with it, i don't log into my server for months at a time so i wanted something without constant updates but other than that it was fine.
replies(2): >>43545421 #>>43548016 #
1. wltr ◴[] No.43545421[source]
I update one of my servers once a year or even longer, and it’s still doing fine with Arch.