←back to thread

190 points psxuaw | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.845s | source | bottom
Show context
nine_k ◴[] No.43536856[source]
If systemd is the reason, there are several good distros without systemd (I run Void Linux in particular).

If "kubesomething" is the reason, there's no requirement to use it. I think most people don't run it on their home servers.

If containers are the reason, then again, they are not a requirement. But they are pretty similar to BSD's jails. I don't think they are particularly complex.

FreeBSD has a number of strong suits: ZFS, a different kernel and network stack, a cohesive system from a small(ish) team of authors, the handbook, etc. But the usual Linux hobgoblins listed above are a red herring here, to my mind.

replies(5): >>43536992 #>>43541101 #>>43541384 #>>43541789 #>>43543787 #
1. charcircuit ◴[] No.43541384[source]
Linux has ZFS too. FreeBSD actually switched over to using the Linux implementation a few years ago.
replies(2): >>43544240 #>>43549126 #
2. M95D ◴[] No.43544240[source]
Linux is just a kernel and ZFS isn't in there.
replies(1): >>43553405 #
3. ksec ◴[] No.43549126[source]
It is more like the ZFS started supporting Linux, not FreeBSD uses Linux implementation.
replies(1): >>43553401 #
4. charcircuit ◴[] No.43553401[source]
>The switch to [ZFS on Linux] as upstream

https://papers.freebsd.org/2019/eurobsdcon/jude-the_future_o...

replies(1): >>43556190 #
5. charcircuit ◴[] No.43553405[source]
There is a Linux driver for ZFS.
6. ksec ◴[] No.43556190{3}[source]
Oh I missed remember OpenZFS started on FreeBSD. Thank you for the correction.