←back to thread

1009 points n1b0m | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.996s | source
Show context
Swoerd123[dead post] ◴[] No.43411056[source]
[flagged]
Zambyte ◴[] No.43411102[source]
What was wrong with Harris?
replies(12): >>43411121 #>>43411128 #>>43411133 #>>43411146 #>>43411203 #>>43411223 #>>43411248 #>>43411296 #>>43411442 #>>43411552 #>>43411640 #>>43412970 #
AlexandrB ◴[] No.43411128[source]
Extremist positions on trans issues. To quote Sam Harris: "Congratulations, Democrats. You have found the most annoying thing in the fucking galaxy and hung it around your necks."[1]

[1] https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning

replies(3): >>43411159 #>>43411231 #>>43411239 #
Trasmatta ◴[] No.43411159[source]
Harris said almost nothing about trans issues during the election. You're attempting to rewrite history if you're claiming it was somehow a core tenant of her campaign. That was entirely propaganda by the opposing party.
replies(3): >>43411242 #>>43411265 #>>43411678 #
jl6 ◴[] No.43411678[source]
She was loudly accused of having extreme positions on a hot button issue. Saying nothing was tantamount to admitting the accusation was true. That's how the court of public opinion works.
replies(1): >>43412042 #
1. eagleislandsong ◴[] No.43412042[source]
> She was loudly accused of having extreme positions on a hot button issue.

She was accused of many things in bad faith, e.g. not being Black, being a Marxist, being a communist, and more. Spending time and effort to address every single one of these would have been tantamount to allowing her opponent to dictate her campaign.

replies(1): >>43413350 #
2. jl6 ◴[] No.43413350[source]
None of those things had attack ads with this kind of impact:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_is_for_they/them

It was and is an important issue to a lot of voters and by ignoring it she let her opponent explain her position for her.