←back to thread

612 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
pmayrgundter ◴[] No.42951372[source]
I tried voice chat. It's very good, except for the politics

We started talking about my plans for the day, and I said I was making chili. G asked if I have a recipe or if I needed one. I said, I started with Obama's recipe many years ago and have worked on it from there.

G gave me a form response that it can't talk politics.

Oh, I'm not talking politics, I'm talking chili.

G then repeated form response and tried to change conversation, and as long as I didn't use the O word, we were allowed to proceed. Phew

replies(8): >>42951630 #>>42954680 #>>42954716 #>>42954903 #>>42957687 #>>42963388 #>>42963959 #>>42996033 #
xnorswap ◴[] No.42951630[source]
I find it horrifying and dystopian that the part where it "Can't talk politics" is just accepted and your complaint is that it interrupts your ability to talk chilli.

"Go back to bed America." "You are free, to do as we tell you"

https://youtu.be/TNPeYflsMdg?t=143

replies(7): >>42951810 #>>42951817 #>>42952683 #>>42953278 #>>42953705 #>>42954874 #>>42959435 #
freedomben ◴[] No.42951817[source]
I agree it's ridiculous that the mention of a politician triggers the block so feels overly tightened (which is the story of existencer for Gemini), but the alternative is that the model will have the politics of it's creators/trainers. Is that preferable to you? (I suppose that depends on how well your politics align with Silicon Valley)
replies(3): >>42956370 #>>42958837 #>>42962135 #
1. spacebanana7 ◴[] No.42962135[source]
They could allow users to choose the politics of their models.