←back to thread

612 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.286s | source
Show context
mohsen1 ◴[] No.42950852[source]
> available via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Vertex AI.

> Gemini 2.0, 2.0 Pro and 2.0 Pro Experimental, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

3 different ways of accessing the API, more than 5 different but extremely similarly named models. Benchmarks only comparing to their own models.

Can't be more "Googley"!

replies(7): >>42950889 #>>42950921 #>>42951056 #>>42951310 #>>42952327 #>>42954910 #>>42967480 #
raverbashing ◴[] No.42951056[source]
Honestly naming conventions in the AI world have been appalling regardless of the company
replies(4): >>42951246 #>>42951304 #>>42952496 #>>42953133 #
belval ◴[] No.42951246[source]
Google isn't even the worst in my opinion. From the top of my head

Anthropic:

Claude 1 Claude Instant 1 Claude 2 Claude Haiku 3 Claude Sonnet 3 Claude Opus 3 Claude Haiku 3.5 Claude Sonnet 3.5 Claude Sonnet 3.5v2

OpenAI:

GPT-3.5 GPT-4 GPT-4o-2024-08-06 GPT-4o GPT-4o-mini o1 o3-mini o1-mini

Fun times when you try to setup throughput provisioning.

replies(3): >>42951345 #>>42960376 #>>42968149 #
1. rfoo ◴[] No.42960376[source]
It's

GPT-3.5 GPT-4 GPT-4-turbo GPT-4o-2024-08-06 GPT-4o GPT-4o-mini o1-preview o1 (low) o1 (medium) o1 (high) o1-mini o3-mini (low) o3-mini (medium) o3-mini (high)

At this pace we are going to get to USB 3.2 Gen 1 real fast.