←back to thread

Gemini 2.0 is now available to everyone

(blog.google)
612 points meetpateltech | 3 comments | 05 Feb 25 16:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
mohsen1 ◴[05 Feb 25 16:27 UTC] No.42950852[source]▶
> available via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Vertex AI.

> Gemini 2.0, 2.0 Pro and 2.0 Pro Experimental, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

3 different ways of accessing the API, more than 5 different but extremely similarly named models. Benchmarks only comparing to their own models.

Can't be more "Googley"!

replies(7): >>42950889 #>>42950921 #>>42951056 #>>42951310 #>>42952327 #>>42954910 #>>42967480 #
raverbashing ◴[05 Feb 25 16:38 UTC] No.42951056[source]▶
Honestly naming conventions in the AI world have been appalling regardless of the company
replies(4): >>42951246 #>>42951304 #>>42952496 #>>42953133 #
jug ◴[05 Feb 25 17:59 UTC] No.42952496[source]▶
Google is the least confusing to me. Old school version number and Pro is better than Flash which is fast and for "simple" stuff (which can be effortless intermediate level coding at this point).

OpenAI is crazy. There may be a day when we might have o5 that is reasoning and 5o that is not, and where they belong to different generations too, snd where "o" meant "Omni" despite o1-o3 not being audiovisual anymore like 4o.

Anthropic crazy too. Sonnets and Haikus, just why... and a 3.5 Sonnet that was released in October that was better than 3.5 Sonnet. (Not a typo) And no one knows why there never was a 3.5 Opus.

replies(3): >>42952907 #>>42953547 #>>42956515 #
1. esafak ◴[05 Feb 25 22:52 UTC] No.42956515[source]▶
4o is a more advanced model than o1 or o3, right!?
replies(2): >>42957322 #>>42963561 #
2. vitorgrs ◴[06 Feb 25 00:17 UTC] No.42957322[source]▶
Imagine when they launch o4...
3. wellthisisgreat ◴[06 Feb 25 15:53 UTC] No.42963561[source]▶
Wait is it?? o1 is more expensive I think