←back to thread

612 points meetpateltech | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.836s | source
Show context
mohsen1 ◴[] No.42950852[source]
> available via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Vertex AI.

> Gemini 2.0, 2.0 Pro and 2.0 Pro Experimental, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

3 different ways of accessing the API, more than 5 different but extremely similarly named models. Benchmarks only comparing to their own models.

Can't be more "Googley"!

replies(7): >>42950889 #>>42950921 #>>42951056 #>>42951310 #>>42952327 #>>42954910 #>>42967480 #
raverbashing ◴[] No.42951056[source]
Honestly naming conventions in the AI world have been appalling regardless of the company
replies(4): >>42951246 #>>42951304 #>>42952496 #>>42953133 #
1. dpkirchner ◴[] No.42953133[source]
Mistral vs mistral.rs, Llama and llama.cpp and ollama, groq and grok. It's all terrible.
replies(1): >>42953682 #
2. danielbln ◴[] No.42953682[source]
Claude Sonnet 3.5...no, not that 3.5, the new 3.5. o3-mini, no not o2. yes there was o1, yes it's better than gpt-4o.
replies(1): >>42965138 #
3. sunaookami ◴[] No.42965138[source]
Don't forget that o3 is actually the second model in the o-series but can't be named o2 due to obvious reasons.